Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #211301
| From | Kent West <westk@acu.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Where'd lsb-compat go? |
| Date | 2019-07-12 16:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yj521-4pc-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <yiMiJ-16D-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <yiU6B-6eh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 7/11/19 10:04 PM, Dominic Knight wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 13:48 -0500, Kent West wrote:
>> Two issues:
>>
>>
>> 1) I have several Debian boxes running as kiosks, and reporting to a
>> centralized Quest-branded "Systems Management Appliance" (SMA). With
>> a
>> recent update to the SMA, the Debian boxes stopped reporting in.
>> After
>> several weeks, I finally discovered that the installation of
>> "lsb-compat" on several of them restored their functionality. Today,
>> when I go to install "lsb-compat" on the other's, I find it's no
>> longer
>> available in Buster. Has it been deprecated? Why? Any ideas how I'm
>> going to get my boxes reporting again to the SMA (what does "lsb-
>> compat"
> ******
> The Linux Standard Base (http://www.linuxbase.org/) was a standard
> core system that third-party applications written for Linux could
> depend upon.
>
> This package provides the most minimal layer to be able to install and
> run selected legacy LSB packages on Debian.
> ******
>
> (untested) Maybe temporarily set your sources to old stable or stretch
> and pick it up from there (then reset them of course).
>
> I could only guess when you installed on the other boxes it was set to
> stable (stretch) which was then stable but is now buster.
>
Okay, I've learned something about aptitude.
I added "oldstable" and after an "aptitude update", the older lsb stuff
became available with an "aptitude search lsb", and I installed
"lsb-compat". And when I removed "oldstable" and did another "aptitude
update", the old lsb stuff was still available. That surprised me; I
thought "aptitude search" would show what was available for downloading,
but I guess it needs to also remember what is currently installed. And
if I purge "lsb-compat" and then do another "aptitude search lsb", sure
enough, the old stuff is now not shown.
Interesting....
So that answers my issue #2.
Back to issue #1:
When I updated the working machine to my current "stable" sources.list,
the version of Debian on that box went from 9.9 to 10, and even though
"lsb-compat" remained installed, the communication with my Quest server
has again gone silent. So apparently I don't need to know what
lsb-compat does, or how to duplicate that functionality in some way now
that lsb-compat is (apparently) deprecated, because the problem seems to
be deeper than that. Although something changed between version 9.9 with
lsb-compat and version 10 with lsb-compat, that's too general of an
issue to ask about on this list; I'll have to narrow down more
specifically what the Quest server is looking for (unless someone just
knows what might have changed between the two versions that might have
affected a third-party in this way - not likely).
And finally, yeah, I normally track release names ("potato", "buster",
etc) in my sources.list files, but for some reason the working machine
was tracking "stable", so I modified the non-working machine from
"stretch" to "stable" to make the two machines more similar. I'm
generally wary of the potential of upgrading to a new version by accident.
Thanks, all!
--
Kent
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Where'd lsb-compat go? Kent West <westk@acu.edu> - 2019-07-11 20:50 +0200
Re: Where'd lsb-compat go? Dominic Knight <dominicknight@gmx.com> - 2019-07-12 05:10 +0200
Re: Where'd lsb-compat go? Kent West <westk@acu.edu> - 2019-07-12 16:50 +0200
Re: Where'd lsb-compat go? Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2019-07-12 10:10 +0200
Re: Where'd lsb-compat go? Kent West <westk@acu.edu> - 2019-07-15 16:20 +0200
Re: Where'd lsb-compat go? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2019-07-15 16:30 +0200
Re: Where'd lsb-compat go? Kent West <westk@acu.edu> - 2019-07-15 21:40 +0200
Re: Where'd lsb-compat go? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-07-15 21:40 +0200
Re: Where'd lsb-compat go? Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2019-07-15 21:50 +0200
Re: Where'd lsb-compat go? Kent West <westk@acu.edu> - 2019-07-15 22:10 +0200
Re: Where'd lsb-compat go? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-07-15 22:20 +0200
Re: Where'd lsb-compat go? Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2019-07-15 23:00 +0200
Re: Where'd lsb-compat go? Kent West <westk@acu.edu> - 2019-07-15 23:20 +0200
Re: Where'd lsb-compat go? Kent West <westk@acu.edu> - 2019-07-15 23:00 +0200
Re: Where'd lsb-compat go? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-07-15 23:20 +0200
Re: Where'd lsb-compat go? Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2019-07-15 23:00 +0200
Re: Where'd lsb-compat go? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2019-07-16 14:30 +0200
Re: Where'd lsb-compat go? Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com> - 2019-07-16 08:50 +0200
Re: Where'd lsb-compat go? Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-07-16 14:50 +0200
csiph-web