Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #211234
| From | Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: tailf vs buster |
| Date | 2019-07-11 18:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yiJEd-7Qd-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <yiJuy-7MG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 06:42:27PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> This just came to my attention - buster lost "tailf" from "util-linux"
> package. I have no problem defining an appropriate alias, of course.
> The question is - who should I thank for this?
The stretch man page says:
DESCRIPTION
tailf is deprecated. It may have unfixed bugs and will be removed from
util-linux in March 2017. Nowadays it's safe to use tail -f (from
coreutils), in contrast to what the original documentation below says.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
tailf vs buster Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-07-11 17:50 +0200
Re: tailf vs buster Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-07-11 18:00 +0200
Re: [SOLVED] tailf vs buster Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-07-11 18:00 +0200
Re: [SOLVED] tailf vs buster <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-07-12 10:00 +0200
Re: [SOLVED] tailf vs buster Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-07-12 10:40 +0200
Re: [SOLVED] tailf vs buster <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-07-12 10:40 +0200
Re: [SOLVED] tailf vs buster Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-07-12 14:50 +0200
Re: [SOLVED] tailf vs buster Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-07-12 15:10 +0200
Re: [SOLVED] tailf vs buster Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2019-07-13 14:30 +0200
Re: [SOLVED] tailf vs buster Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-07-14 08:50 +0200
csiph-web