Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #963602
| From | Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#913913: Bug#931524: security.debian.org: bullseye security updates may be silently skipped on systems using apt pinning |
| Date | 2019-07-08 10:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <yhxvs-4o4-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <yhhh0-32l-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <wUTxg-66F-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <yhvtE-3d2-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <wUTxg-66F-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <yhvtE-3d2-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 08:26:50AM +0200, Piotr Engelking wrote: > Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org>: > > > > Now a=testing packages have higher priority than the a=testing-security > > > ones, which results in security updates not being installed. Another > > > method of pinning configuration, using APT::Default-Release, has > > > exactly the same effect. > > > > And this is a good thing IMO, as you want to be able to pin release > > over security. > > Why? Anyway, this was already possible, using l=Debian and > l=Debian-Security. ugh. > > > > * Change the suite from a=testing-security back to a=testing. This is > > > least work, but I don't know if it has any downsides I am unaware of. > > > > That means that testing-security does not work, as testing-security is > > not testing and apt will complain. > > Which diagnostics are you talking about? I wasn't able to find it. e.g. for Ubuntu, using the devel symlink for eoan, you get: W: Conflicting distribution: http://de1.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu devel InRelease (expected devel but got eoan) Same thing would apply in this case and it would say: W: Conflicting distribution: http://security.debian.org/debian-security testing-security InRelease (expected testing-security but got testing) or it might even say "got bullseye", not entirely sure. Anyhow, we've got two years to fix this, no need to rush a "fix" out now. -- debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev ubuntu core developer i speak de, en
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#931524: security.debian.org: bullseye security updates may be silently skipped on systems using apt pinning Piotr Engelking <inkerman42@gmail.com> - 2019-07-07 10:10 +0200
Bug#913913: security.debian.org: bullseye security updates may be silently skipped on systems using apt pinning Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> - 2019-07-07 13:50 +0200
Bug#913913: Bug#931524: security.debian.org: bullseye security updates may be silently skipped on systems using apt pinning Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2019-07-07 15:40 +0200
Bug#913913: Bug#931524: security.debian.org: bullseye security updates may be silently skipped on systems using apt pinning Piotr Engelking <inkerman42@gmail.com> - 2019-07-07 17:10 +0200
Bug#913913: Bug#931524: security.debian.org: bullseye security updates may be silently skipped on systems using apt pinning Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org> - 2019-07-07 17:30 +0200
Bug#913913: Bug#931524: security.debian.org: bullseye security updates may be silently skipped on systems using apt pinning Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org> - 2019-07-07 18:40 +0200
Bug#913913: Bug#931524: security.debian.org: bullseye security updates may be silently skipped on systems using apt pinning Piotr Engelking <inkerman42@gmail.com> - 2019-07-08 08:40 +0200
Bug#913913: Bug#931524: security.debian.org: bullseye security updates may be silently skipped on systems using apt pinning Julian Andres Klode <jak@debian.org> - 2019-07-08 10:50 +0200
csiph-web