TSOhost - still OK for small users?

From	"J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG@255soft.uk>
Newsgroups	demon.service
Subject	TSOhost - still OK for small users?
Date	2020-12-15 12:02 +0000
Organization	255 software
Message-ID	<yMeva1CBXK2fFww$@255soft.uk> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

I moved to TSOhost when I left Demon (well, really, Namesco) - I think 
on recommendations here. Mainly just to handle email, though their 
minimum package I took included a tiny (by modern standards - many times 
the original Demon amount!) webpage (which I've mainly used as many 
people use DropBox and similar, without imposing script on my 
share-ees).

Since then, I've been perfectly happy with them (basically, have had no 
need to contact them at all).

Of late, though, I've had a few emails from them advertising new 
facilities they're offering, which sound marvellous - as far as I 
understand them - for the more demanding website user.

I'm a little concerned that they may ditch "support" for the 
ex-Demon-type user like me, who really just wants mail 
forwarding/handling and very basic webspace. Any others here in the same 
boat?
-- 
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

gazing at someone in distress is prurient and rude.
- Alison Graham, RT 2015/6/20-26

Back to demon.service | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

TSOhost - still OK for small users? "J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2020-12-15 12:02 +0000
  Re: TSOhost - still OK for small users? Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2020-12-15 13:40 +0000
  Re: TSOhost - still OK for small users? Malcolm Loades <devnull@loades.net> - 2020-12-15 14:08 +0000
    Re: TSOhost - still OK for small users? "J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> - 2020-12-15 15:51 +0000
    Re: TSOhost - still OK for small users? John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> - 2020-12-15 17:06 +0000
    Re: TSOhost - still OK for small users? Chris S <myr9gc8v3y@snkmail.com> - 2020-12-17 16:01 +0000

csiph-web