Groups > linux.debian.user > #206035

Re: Docker and Container Tools Podman/Buildah/Skopeo

From	Dejan Jocic <jodejka@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: Docker and Container Tools Podman/Buildah/Skopeo
Date	2019-03-06 15:40 +0100
Message-ID	<xyFSa-5B3-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <xyk1k-gh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <xykNH-MI-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <xynsd-2eI-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <xyCKC-3Iz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <xyFp7-5qy-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 06-03-19, Reco wrote:
> 	Hi.
> 
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 12:17:27PM +0100, Dejan Jocic wrote:
> > On 05-03-19, Reco wrote:
> > > 
> > > Canonical's famous for their NIH too. Mir, Unity, LXD - it's a long
> > > list, although RedHat has longer one.
> > > 
> > > Reco
> > 
> > 
> > Mir and Unity I can get, but why would you put LXD in that sentence about
> > NIH? 
> 
> Given the existence of LXC, why would anyone need LXD?
> 
> Reco
> 

You do realise that LXD is wrap around LXC, or rather libxlc, which
improves its functionality, while not taking anything from it?

Some of that functionality is live snapshot migration, bit improved
security, improved/easier to manage networking, overall better
management. 

Also, while Canonical is not only supporter of LXC, it is practically
major supporter, as far as I know ( but could be wrong about it ).So,
again, I don't really think that it belongs under NIH syndrome.

Thanks for reply,
Dejan

Thread

Docker and Container Tools Podman/Buildah/Skopeo plataleas plataleas <plataleas@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 14:30 +0100
  Re: Docker and Container Tools Podman/Buildah/Skopeo Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-03-05 16:20 +0100
    Re: Docker and Container Tools Podman/Buildah/Skopeo <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-03-05 17:10 +0100
      Re: Docker and Container Tools Podman/Buildah/Skopeo Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-03-05 20:00 +0100
        Re: Docker and Container Tools Podman/Buildah/Skopeo <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2019-03-06 10:40 +0100
        Re: Docker and Container Tools Podman/Buildah/Skopeo Dejan Jocic <jodejka@gmail.com> - 2019-03-06 12:20 +0100
          Re: Docker and Container Tools Podman/Buildah/Skopeo Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-03-06 15:10 +0100
            Re: Docker and Container Tools Podman/Buildah/Skopeo Dejan Jocic <jodejka@gmail.com> - 2019-03-06 15:40 +0100
              Re: Docker and Container Tools Podman/Buildah/Skopeo Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-03-06 16:50 +0100
    Re: Docker and Container Tools Podman/Buildah/Skopeo Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-03-08 10:40 +0100
    Re: Docker and Container Tools Podman/Buildah/Skopeo Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2019-03-08 10:40 +0100
  Re: Docker and Container Tools Podman/Buildah/Skopeo Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2019-03-08 11:00 +0100

csiph-web