Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #205776
| From | Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Label multimeanings : doc bug? |
| Date | 2019-02-27 10:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <xw3ei-2N2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <xw0Jr-1lz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <xw12N-1rP-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <xw1Pb-21G-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi. On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:12:43PM -0800, Rusi Mody wrote: > Reco wrote: > Running parted on a logical volume is definitely not the best of ideas > > Sure! > > My point was however that for a tool (eg gparted) where label already has the LABEL= sense this other (disklabel) terminology, more common in the BSD world, seems to be an avoidable confusion. I see nothing to be confused about. A disklabel, as they call it in parted(8) applies to a disk device. Or a LUN. A LABEL= is a filesystem attribute, it's impossible to have one without a filesystem. Reco
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Label multimeanings : doc bug? Rusi Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 07:20 +0100
Re: Label multimeanings : doc bug? Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-02-27 07:40 +0100
Re: Label multimeanings : doc bug? Rusi Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 08:30 +0100
Re: Label multimeanings : doc bug? Rusi Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 08:30 +0100
Re: Label multimeanings : doc bug? Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2019-02-27 10:00 +0100
Re: Label multimeanings : doc bug? Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2019-02-27 19:00 +0100
Re: Label multimeanings : doc bug? Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2019-02-27 21:30 +0100
Re: Label multimeanings : doc bug? Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2019-02-28 04:40 +0100
csiph-web