Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #57705
| From | "Rudy Velthuis" <newsgroups@rvelthuis.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: splitting a string into 2 new strings |
| Date | 2017-04-21 09:45 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <xn0kozrfz1ooo0003@nntp.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <od8gd9$1hsj$1@gioia.aioe.org> <od9tpp$1mmg$1@gioia.aioe.org> <xn0koyolz8gwlap001@nntp.aioe.org> <odboqo$p54$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
HAA wrote: > > > Forth has sufficient flexibility so when there's no library or not > > > fit for purpose, you won't be left stranded. > > > > I guess that is true for almost any general purpose language. > > > > But writing and testing your own code is not always preferrable to > > using existing, well written and thoroughly tested code from a > > (bonafide) library. > > I know what's in the library code I write myself and can make an > intelligent decision whether or not to use it. Sure. But it is a bit tedious to have to write everything yourself, especially if there are well written and trusted libraries around already. Trusting only your own code smells a bit like a case of NIH syndrome, IMO. -- Rudy Velthuis http://www.rvelthuis.de "It's not at all important to get it right the first time. It's vitally important to get it right the last time." -- Andrew Hunt and David Thomas
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
.Re: splitting a string into 2 new strings "Robert L." <No_spamming@noWhere_7073.org> - 2017-04-19 20:13 +0000
Re: splitting a string into 2 new strings "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-20 19:07 +1000
Re: splitting a string into 2 new strings "Rudy Velthuis" <newsgroups@rvelthuis.de> - 2017-04-20 17:08 +0000
Re: splitting a string into 2 new strings "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-21 11:54 +1000
Re: splitting a string into 2 new strings "Rudy Velthuis" <newsgroups@rvelthuis.de> - 2017-04-21 09:45 +0000
Re: splitting a string into 2 new strings "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-21 23:32 +1000
Re: splitting a string into 2 new strings john <anon@example.com> - 2017-04-21 16:36 +0100
Re: splitting a string into 2 new strings "Rudy Velthuis" <newsgroups@rvelthuis.de> - 2017-04-21 20:15 +0000
Re: splitting a string into 2 new strings Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 17:06 -0700
Re: splitting a string into 2 new strings "Rudy Velthuis" <newsgroups@rvelthuis.de> - 2017-04-22 04:59 +0000
Re: splitting a string into 2 new strings "HAA" <someone@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-23 10:55 +1000
Re: splitting a string into 2 new strings "Rudy Velthuis" <newsgroups@rvelthuis.de> - 2017-04-29 03:15 +0000
Re: splitting a string into 2 new strings The Beez <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 04:07 -0700
Re: splitting a string into 2 new strings "Rudy Velthuis" <newsgroups@rvelthuis.de> - 2017-05-05 15:26 +0000
Re: splitting a string into 2 new strings hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2017-04-20 13:32 -0700
Re: .Re: splitting a string into 2 new strings "Robert L." <No_spamming@noWhere_7073.org> - 2017-04-21 00:19 +0000
csiph-web