Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #208079

Re: which mutt?

From Francisco M Neto <fmneto@fmneto.com.br>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: which mutt?
Date 2019-05-03 19:00 +0200
Message-ID <xTJHr-Ro-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <xTyiZ-2tL-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <xTERr-6ns-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <xTHPj-89a-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 10:51 -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 08:43 -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote:
> > AFAIK in Stretch Mutt actually means Neomutt. There was a flamewar between
> > the
> > package maintainer and the Mutt guy a while ago about that. It wasn't
> > pretty[1,2].
> > 
> > 
> > In Buster, Mutt means Mutt, and Neomutt means Neomutt.
> 
> Is there a formal policy or plan for how issues like this are handled in
> the future *before* flamewars begin?  There was a similar issue with
> mailx (bsd-mailx, heirloom-mailx, s-nail) where decisions were made by
> one group and offences were taken by others.  It just seems like a clear
> policy could prevent a lot of these "name takeover" issues.

	I'm not sure about what happened to mailx, but with Mutt it was a bad
decision made by the package maintainer years ago when applying the Neomutt
patch became too cumbersome; it was not foreseen in Debian Policy, so I don't
think there is any provision for it in it. That's probably why it ended up in a
flame like that. 

-- 
[]'s,

Francisco M Neto

GPG: 4096R/D692FBF0

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

which mutt? "Russell L. Harris" <rlharris@oplink.net> - 2019-05-03 06:50 +0200
  Re: which mutt? Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2019-05-03 13:50 +0200
  Re: which mutt? Francisco M Neto <fmneto@fmneto.com.br> - 2019-05-03 13:50 +0200
    Re: which mutt? Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> - 2019-05-03 17:00 +0200
      Re: which mutt? Francisco M Neto <fmneto@fmneto.com.br> - 2019-05-03 19:00 +0200
    Re: which mutt? Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2019-05-03 18:50 +0200
      Re: which mutt? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-05-03 20:00 +0200
        Re: which mutt? Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2019-05-03 23:30 +0200
          Re: which mutt? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2019-05-04 09:50 +0200
            Re: which mutt? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2019-05-04 14:00 +0200
      Re: which mutt? "Russell L. Harris" <rlharris@oplink.net> - 2019-05-03 20:50 +0200
        Re: which mutt? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2019-05-03 21:00 +0200
          Re: which mutt? David Jardine <david@jardine.de> - 2019-05-08 00:20 +0200
        Re: which mutt? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-04 05:20 +0200
          Re: which mutt? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-05-04 10:20 +0200
            Re: which mutt? Dejan Jocic <jodejka@gmail.com> - 2019-05-04 15:00 +0200
  Re: which mutt? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2019-05-03 22:00 +0200

csiph-web