Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #208079
| From | Francisco M Neto <fmneto@fmneto.com.br> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: which mutt? |
| Date | 2019-05-03 19:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <xTJHr-Ro-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <xTyiZ-2tL-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <xTERr-6ns-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <xTHPj-89a-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 10:51 -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 08:43 -0300, Francisco M Neto wrote: > > AFAIK in Stretch Mutt actually means Neomutt. There was a flamewar between > > the > > package maintainer and the Mutt guy a while ago about that. It wasn't > > pretty[1,2]. > > > > > > In Buster, Mutt means Mutt, and Neomutt means Neomutt. > > Is there a formal policy or plan for how issues like this are handled in > the future *before* flamewars begin? There was a similar issue with > mailx (bsd-mailx, heirloom-mailx, s-nail) where decisions were made by > one group and offences were taken by others. It just seems like a clear > policy could prevent a lot of these "name takeover" issues. I'm not sure about what happened to mailx, but with Mutt it was a bad decision made by the package maintainer years ago when applying the Neomutt patch became too cumbersome; it was not foreseen in Debian Policy, so I don't think there is any provision for it in it. That's probably why it ended up in a flame like that. -- []'s, Francisco M Neto GPG: 4096R/D692FBF0
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
which mutt? "Russell L. Harris" <rlharris@oplink.net> - 2019-05-03 06:50 +0200
Re: which mutt? Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2019-05-03 13:50 +0200
Re: which mutt? Francisco M Neto <fmneto@fmneto.com.br> - 2019-05-03 13:50 +0200
Re: which mutt? Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> - 2019-05-03 17:00 +0200
Re: which mutt? Francisco M Neto <fmneto@fmneto.com.br> - 2019-05-03 19:00 +0200
Re: which mutt? Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2019-05-03 18:50 +0200
Re: which mutt? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-05-03 20:00 +0200
Re: which mutt? Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2019-05-03 23:30 +0200
Re: which mutt? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2019-05-04 09:50 +0200
Re: which mutt? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2019-05-04 14:00 +0200
Re: which mutt? "Russell L. Harris" <rlharris@oplink.net> - 2019-05-03 20:50 +0200
Re: which mutt? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2019-05-03 21:00 +0200
Re: which mutt? David Jardine <david@jardine.de> - 2019-05-08 00:20 +0200
Re: which mutt? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-04 05:20 +0200
Re: which mutt? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-05-04 10:20 +0200
Re: which mutt? Dejan Jocic <jodejka@gmail.com> - 2019-05-04 15:00 +0200
Re: which mutt? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2019-05-03 22:00 +0200
csiph-web