Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #208067

Re: which mutt?

From Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: which mutt?
Date 2019-05-03 13:50 +0200
Message-ID <xTERr-6ns-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <xTyiZ-2tL-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Amateur Radio!

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

* On 2019 02 May 23:45 -0500, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> I searched and read a number of list threads on the matter of Mutt vs.
> neoMutt, but most of the threads I found were a few years old, so I do
> not know the outcome of the matter.  I also found a web page which
> says that Debian 10 is going to offer a "neoMutt" package.  Does this
> mean that Debian 10 also is going to offer a "Mutt" package, or is
> neoMutt going to be the sole Mutt offering?

In the Testing repository both are available.  Mutt is at version
1.10.1-2 and neoMutt is at version 20180716+dfsg.1-1.  I am using the
neomutt package due to its offering of additional attachment header
highlighting capability.

> I used Mutt years ago; I wish now to run the stable version of the
> original Mutt, maintained by Elkins and company.  And, if at all
> possible, I wish to install an official Mutt package from the Debian
> repository.

If you are satisfied with Mutt's capability it will work well.  I've
been using Mutt for almost 20 years and it has continued to serve me
well without any surprises.  Weigh the features of each against what you
wish to accomplish and choose the one that is best for you.

- Nate

-- 

"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds.  The pessimist fears this is true."

Web: http://www.n0nb.us  GPG key: D55A8819  GitHub: N0NB

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

which mutt? "Russell L. Harris" <rlharris@oplink.net> - 2019-05-03 06:50 +0200
  Re: which mutt? Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> - 2019-05-03 13:50 +0200
  Re: which mutt? Francisco M Neto <fmneto@fmneto.com.br> - 2019-05-03 13:50 +0200
    Re: which mutt? Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> - 2019-05-03 17:00 +0200
      Re: which mutt? Francisco M Neto <fmneto@fmneto.com.br> - 2019-05-03 19:00 +0200
    Re: which mutt? Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2019-05-03 18:50 +0200
      Re: which mutt? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-05-03 20:00 +0200
        Re: which mutt? Jimmy Johnson <field.engineer@gmail.com> - 2019-05-03 23:30 +0200
          Re: which mutt? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2019-05-04 09:50 +0200
            Re: which mutt? Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2019-05-04 14:00 +0200
      Re: which mutt? "Russell L. Harris" <rlharris@oplink.net> - 2019-05-03 20:50 +0200
        Re: which mutt? Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2019-05-03 21:00 +0200
          Re: which mutt? David Jardine <david@jardine.de> - 2019-05-08 00:20 +0200
        Re: which mutt? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2019-05-04 05:20 +0200
          Re: which mutt? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-05-04 10:20 +0200
            Re: which mutt? Dejan Jocic <jodejka@gmail.com> - 2019-05-04 15:00 +0200
  Re: which mutt? Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2019-05-03 22:00 +0200

csiph-web