Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #207974

Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode?

From Curt <curty@free.fr>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode?
Date 2019-04-29 14:40 +0200
Message-ID <xSdJE-1Y7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <xS15L-2HQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <xS7kS-6p0-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <xS9mG-7Ce-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <xS9wl-7UW-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Unorganized

Show all headers | View raw


On 2019-04-29, Thomas Pircher <thp+debian@p5r.uk> wrote:
> Curt wrote:
>> Maybe that lead-in violates some RFC, although you'd think what's in the
>> header's in the header and what ain't ain't and ne'er the twain shall
>> meet.
>> 
>> At any rate, bw threads fine here, so it must be you (or me).
>
> It's you -- or rather bw's MUA, I'm afraid. :-)
> His mails don't thread in neomutt neither, specifically because the
> headers sent by his MUA don't include neither the Reference nor the
> In-Reply-To fields.

I now understand that bw's mails do not comprise those thread-critical
fields. As an Alpine user myself, I can only wonder how he manages it,
and, more particularly, why he manages it. I guess my slrn news client
(I read the list through an NTTP host) must work it out via the
'Subject:' line (as suggested by Tixy elsewhere), threading acceptably
even in the absence of the missing fields.

Whether this whole business has any relation to the custom lead-in
string in his email bodies is a matter for conjecture.

A bientôt.

> Thomas
>
>


-- 
The major, who had been a great fencer, did not believe in bravery, and spent
much time while we sat in the machines correcting my grammar. He had
complimented me on how I spoke Italian, and we talked together very easily. One
day I had said that Italian seemed such an easy language to me that I could not
take a great interest in it; everything was so easy to say. "Ah, yes," the
major said. "Why, then, do you not take up the use of grammar?" - "Another Country"

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? bw <bwtnguy@yahoo.com> - 2019-04-29 01:10 +0200
  Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2019-04-29 07:50 +0200
    Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-04-29 10:00 +0200
      Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Thomas Pircher <thp+debian@p5r.uk> - 2019-04-29 10:10 +0200
        Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2019-04-29 10:40 +0200
          Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Thomas Pircher <thp+debian@p5r.uk> - 2019-04-29 13:20 +0200
        Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-04-29 14:40 +0200
  Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Björn Persson <Bjorn@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se> - 2019-05-02 15:10 +0200
    Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2019-05-02 15:30 +0200
      Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2019-05-02 21:50 +0200
        Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> - 2019-05-02 23:40 +0200
          Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Brian Potkin <brian@copernicus.org.uk> - 2019-05-03 21:50 +0200
    Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2019-05-02 23:30 +0200
      Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Björn Persson <Bjorn@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se> - 2019-05-05 18:00 +0200
        Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2019-05-05 19:40 +0200

csiph-web