Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #207974
| From | Curt <curty@free.fr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? |
| Date | 2019-04-29 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <xSdJE-1Y7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <xS15L-2HQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <xS7kS-6p0-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <xS9mG-7Ce-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <xS9wl-7UW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Unorganized |
On 2019-04-29, Thomas Pircher <thp+debian@p5r.uk> wrote: > Curt wrote: >> Maybe that lead-in violates some RFC, although you'd think what's in the >> header's in the header and what ain't ain't and ne'er the twain shall >> meet. >> >> At any rate, bw threads fine here, so it must be you (or me). > > It's you -- or rather bw's MUA, I'm afraid. :-) > His mails don't thread in neomutt neither, specifically because the > headers sent by his MUA don't include neither the Reference nor the > In-Reply-To fields. I now understand that bw's mails do not comprise those thread-critical fields. As an Alpine user myself, I can only wonder how he manages it, and, more particularly, why he manages it. I guess my slrn news client (I read the list through an NTTP host) must work it out via the 'Subject:' line (as suggested by Tixy elsewhere), threading acceptably even in the absence of the missing fields. Whether this whole business has any relation to the custom lead-in string in his email bodies is a matter for conjecture. A bientôt. > Thomas > > -- The major, who had been a great fencer, did not believe in bravery, and spent much time while we sat in the machines correcting my grammar. He had complimented me on how I spoke Italian, and we talked together very easily. One day I had said that Italian seemed such an easy language to me that I could not take a great interest in it; everything was so easy to say. "Ah, yes," the major said. "Why, then, do you not take up the use of grammar?" - "Another Country"
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? bw <bwtnguy@yahoo.com> - 2019-04-29 01:10 +0200
Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2019-04-29 07:50 +0200
Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-04-29 10:00 +0200
Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Thomas Pircher <thp+debian@p5r.uk> - 2019-04-29 10:10 +0200
Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2019-04-29 10:40 +0200
Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Thomas Pircher <thp+debian@p5r.uk> - 2019-04-29 13:20 +0200
Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2019-04-29 14:40 +0200
Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Björn Persson <Bjorn@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se> - 2019-05-02 15:10 +0200
Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2019-05-02 15:30 +0200
Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2019-05-02 21:50 +0200
Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org> - 2019-05-02 23:40 +0200
Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Brian Potkin <brian@copernicus.org.uk> - 2019-05-03 21:50 +0200
Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2019-05-02 23:30 +0200
Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? Björn Persson <Bjorn@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se> - 2019-05-05 18:00 +0200
Re: Is Debian 9 supposed to work on a Geode? deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2019-05-05 19:40 +0200
csiph-web