Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #207050

Re: How could I install ecryptfs-utils on Buster

From David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: How could I install ecryptfs-utils on Buster
Date 2019-04-05 22:10 +0200
Message-ID <xJDjX-31X-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <xJyDE-7Y-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 4/5/19 8:07 AM, Pierre Fourès wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm in the process of rebuilding new virtual instances for the Desktop
> user's of my company. We provides these instance in order to be able
> to run the validated software stack on non-validated software stacks
> (ie. running a virtual box inside a custom installed Linux, or on OSX
> or Windows). Theses virtual machines usually ends on laptops. In order
> to keep safe the company's data in case of a laptop being stolen, we
> set up an encrypted home with ecryptfs-utils.
> 
> More over, the install process of Desktop machines is standardized and
> shared with bare-metal machines. I install all through deboostrap
> (from the validated stack we use on our servers). In order to run the
> Desktops, and because of new hardware with video cards not supported
> in Stretch, we took the move to Buster a bit earlier an went into the
> testing wonderland. This is mostly just a dist-upgrade of the current
> validated stack. As a side effect, this helps to pre-validate all our
> stack on Buster.
> 
> But I just discovered today that ecryptfs-utils is not longer part of
> Buster since 2018-12-19. To my understanding, this is due to bug [1]
> which perfectly justify the removal of ecryptfs-utils from Buster.
> This bug don't really affect our use case scenario as we only target
> to protect the data at rest only. I would prefer a bug-free solution,
> but we find acceptable to keep on using ecryptfs, especially in
> contrast of taking the time to configure something else. I thus
> solicit your advice to devise a solution to make it installable again.
> 
> I would like a « simple and easy » solution. Here is the options I see :
> 
> - Install ecryptfs-utils before proceeding the dist upgrade to buster,
> so I have the package installed. But won't Buster removes it, as
> feared in [2] ? I have also prepared some virtual instances for our
> users and I would prefer not to throw them away to start anew if
> possible.
> 
> - Builds the virtual instance on Stretch only, not Buster. But I
> wouldn't like it much as it would make a split of versions on the
> Desktops, and then would add maintenance. More over, user would not be
> at ease with different versions of what they use depending if their
> are on their bare-metal machine (requiring Buster) or on their virtual
> instance (requiring Stretch). Also, with staying on Stretch, when
> Buster turn stable stable, then oldstable, how shall I handle the fact
> that Stretch will slowly slip in retirement and that Buster as no
> alternative, so I can't make the move.
> 
> - Install ecryptfs-utils from Sid ? Isn't it risky to take it from Sid
> ? Especially for such a package.
> 
> - Some other approach I not foresee, like maybe add the Stretch
> repository in sources.list in order to grab it from there ? It it
> feasible ?
> 
> I think I would prefer grab the package from Stretch than from Sid.
> Both are right now the same versions (as was the version for Buster),
> but taking it from Strech would grant me it will not change. I also
> prefer not adding the Sid repos in the sources.list. I already was
> pretty reticent to made the bump to testing, so to take the plunge to
> Sid is way to extreme. Clearly, what would be best would be to proceed
> with a Buster already installed system.
> 
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765854
> [2] https://www.reddit.com/r/debian/comments/asei6c/ecryptfsutils_in_buster/
> 
> Regards,
> Pierre.

AFAIK dm-crypt is the canonical disc encryption technology on Linux (see 
crypttab(5) and cryptsetup(8)).  I like the fact that it operates at the 
device level, so everything on an encrypted disc or partition is 
automatically and inescapably encrypted.  File system level encryption, 
such as ecryptfs(7), might make sense for cloud directories or 
sneaker-net media.  I use ccrypt(1) for individual files, but vim(1) has 
an encrypted mode that is very appealing for certain use-cases.


David

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

How could I install ecryptfs-utils on Buster Pierre Fourès <pierre.foures@gmail.com> - 2019-04-05 17:10 +0200
  Re: How could I install ecryptfs-utils on Buster David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2019-04-05 22:10 +0200
    Re: How could I install ecryptfs-utils on Buster Pierre Fourès <pierre.foures@gmail.com> - 2019-04-10 10:40 +0200
      Re: How could I install ecryptfs-utils on Buster David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2019-04-11 03:00 +0200
        Re: How could I install ecryptfs-utils on Buster Pierre Fourès <pierre.foures@gmail.com> - 2019-04-11 16:00 +0200
          Re: How could I install ecryptfs-utils on Buster David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2019-04-12 06:00 +0200
            Re: How could I install ecryptfs-utils on Buster Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> - 2019-04-16 02:00 +0200
  Re: How could I install ecryptfs-utils on Buster Pierre Fourès <pierre.foures@gmail.com> - 2019-04-10 15:50 +0200
    Re: How could I install ecryptfs-utils on Buster andreimpopescu@gmail.com - 2019-06-10 09:50 +0200

csiph-web