Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #206318

Re: Fstab Questions (Final time)

From "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Fstab Questions (Final time)
Date 2019-03-18 16:20 +0100
Message-ID <xD2dr-36l-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <xCCsF-3oP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <xCZIB-1tg-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <xD0bD-1SY-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <xD0v0-1Zg-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <xD17I-2rS-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 03/18/2019 09:59 AM, Dan Purgert wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> rhkramer@gmail.com  wrote:
>> On Monday, March 18, 2019 08:56:20 AM Dan Purgert wrote:
>>> I'm bad with the FHS, but shouldn't say your shark-attack movies be
>>> somewhere in /usr(/local) ?
>> I'd say no -- if they were shark attack programs, /usr/local could be
>> appropriate.  (/usr/local is for local programs)
> I think source code can go there as well (/usr/local/src). But taking a
> quick look at the FHS, /usr/local is indeed more geared towards
> programs, rather than just "read-only" data.  So, yeah, /usr/local is
> probably out.
>
>> If they are files (movies, documents, MIDI files, ....), they should
>> be either in /home/<user> ... (keep reading)
> Maybe I misinterpreted it -- I thought we were talking about "shared"
> media, saved on an extra harddrive / partition, rather than something
> that was more "personal" in nature as implied by sticking it in $HOME.
>
>>> maybe /srv if you're running a media
>>> server?
>> I've had some input into the FHS -- read more below -- but I don't
>> remember offhand about /srv -- I vaguely think that is ok, but keep
>> reading ...
> According to the FHS[1] , "/srv - Data for services provided by this
> system".  So, if it's a media server (rather than a desktop with extra
> harddrive for local watching), it seems a mountpoint within /srv (e.g.
> /srv/movies ) would conform to things.
>>> Or is there some caveat that allows for mounting new partitions into
>>> the root directory, while remaining "FHS compliant"?
>> I (some time ago) read the FHS more than once, and had some input into
>> changing some portions of it (related to /home -- my intent was to allow
>> <user> owned files to be either in /home/<user> or in some other,
>> arbitrarily named, top level directory chosen by the user.
> So, you'd move their home directory then? Or do you mean to say that
>
>    $HOME -> /home/username (as is usually done)
>    $FILES -> /somewhere (some new directory for them to throw stuff)
>
>
>> I do this all the time, and I believe I am in compliance with the FHS.
>>
>> If anyone (who is familiar with the FHS) believes different, I'd like
>> to know, and I would then attempt to amend the FHS appropriately.
> That approach seems to be non-compliant, with the idea that the root
> filesystem (/) is supposed to be "as small as reasonably possible".
> Though that being said, the FHS seems geared more toward programmers
> (i.e. "use the defined directories for your application's needs") and
> distro maintainers (i.e. "think very carefully before customizing your
> directories...")
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEBcqaUD8uEzVNxUrujhHd8xJ5ooEFAlyPpCUACgkQjhHd8xJ5
> ooGmtwgAqBPsqSGF1sBvOcPAc+52SPv09ZqOJK6kZBoEyQpihan6dSic3B1Ho+0K
> 0BrM6lEglGJvD6aL6qds5dfg9hvkaSeurd+L+mV6mlY/hOhx9/K5fkVUCKkeRlHv
> Y/W+mgdLQdOOtPAe3cWBZXFSNyg2N/63US2ScnW65OwQiBKnN+SPEhB3mpBBl+2p
> ZZy8/EQ7zOEHg7+3pkcb5ButnP10rfv1ROmiTXuFP5rSCDoHeHEZVP9rO9+K5bba
> EpLgkrT3odtSBS0bajMr/X0bcUbv+SmHl946tobI5oawQ1Xq3qKdkvCkMKaPo5J2
> we/dTA1sNVVdqEEtimqUMFRZOLV0OQ==
> =HJ3a
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

While I appreciate the comments of folks much more learned than I in the 
intricacies of Linux, I would like to hue to the intent of my original 
thread of postings. That is requesting help in getting my OS setup after 
some hardware charges. (please note I am not trying to start a flame war.)

I now have a system that boots without any problems.

The fstab is:

# <file system> <mount point> <type> <options> <dump> <pass>
# / was on /dev/sda1 during installation
UUID=71f1ed49-9178-4bbc-b872-510f7982e245 / ext4 errors=remount-ro 0 1
# swap was on /dev/sda5 during installation
UUID=4b041dec-d00f-4acf-a731-f6a34d885105 none swap sw 0 0
UUID=900b5f0b-4f3d-4a64-8c91-29aee4c6fd07 /sdb1 ext4 rw,users,defaults 0 0
UUID=1f363165-2c59-4236-850d-36d1e807099e /sdc1 ext4 rw,users,defaults 0 0
/dev/sr0 /media/cdrom0 udf,iso9660 user,noauto 0 0

which results in:

comp@AbNormal:~$ lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sda 8:0 0 465.8G 0 disk
├─sda1 8:1 0 457.9G 0 part /
├─sda2 8:2 0 1K 0 part
└─sda5 8:5 0 7.9G 0 part [SWAP]
sdb 8:16 0 1.8T 0 disk
├─sdb1 8:17 0 1.8T 0 part /sdb1
├─sdb2 8:18 0 1K 0 part
└─sdb5 8:21 0 7.9G 0 part
sdc 8:32 0 465.8G 0 disk
└─sdc1 8:33 0 465.8G 0 part /sdc1
sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom

Further, as root I created a directory; /sbc1/Apps and gave it 
permissions chmod 777 /sdc1/Apps -R. I can read and write to Apps,

Currently I have:

comp@AbNormal:/sdc1/Apps$ l
total 68208
drwxr-xr-x 27 comp comp 4096 Jan 1 09:17 Fortran
-rwxrwxrwx 1 comp comp 69826864 Mar 18 10:16 
Miniconda3-latest-Linux-x86_64.sh
drwxr-xr-x 57 comp comp 4096 Feb 11 13:24 Models
drwxr-xr-x 3 comp comp 4096 Mar 17 08:43 orca
drwxr-xr-x 41 comp comp 4096 Feb 2 13:02 Python

Unfortunately, when I attemped running 
MMiniconda3-latest-Linux-x86_64.sh I got;

in part:

Miniconda3 will now be installed into this location:
/home/comp/miniconda3

- Press ENTER to confirm the location
- Press CTRL-C to abort the installation
- Or specify a different location below

[/home/comp/miniconda3] >>> /sdc1/Apps/miniconda3
PREFIX=/sdc1/Apps/miniconda3
installing: python-3.7.1-h0371630_7 ...
Miniconda3-latest-Linux-x86_64.sh: 370: 
Miniconda3-latest-Linux-x86_64.sh: 
/sdc1/Apps/miniconda3/pkgs/python-3.7.1-h0371630_7/bin/python: 
Permission denied

Even I can see that I have a permissions problem.

Help addressing this problem will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance.



-- 
Stephen P. Molnar, Ph.D.
Consultant
www.molecular-modeling.net
(614)312-7528 (c)
Skype: smolnar1

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Fstab Questions (Final time) "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2019-03-17 12:50 +0100
  Re: Fstab Questions (Final time) john doe <johndoe65534@mail.com> - 2019-03-17 13:40 +0100
  Re: Fstab Questions (Final time) Charlie Kravetz <charlie@keepingdreams.com> - 2019-03-17 13:50 +0100
    Re: Fstab Questions (Final time) David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2019-03-17 15:10 +0100
  Re: Fstab Questions (Final time) David <bouncingcats@gmail.com> - 2019-03-17 22:50 +0100
  Re: Fstab Questions (Final time) Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2019-03-18 13:40 +0100
    Re: Fstab Questions (Final time) Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-03-18 14:10 +0100
      Re: Fstab Questions (Final time) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2019-03-18 14:30 +0100
        Re: Fstab Questions (Final time) Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-03-18 15:10 +0100
          Re: Fstab Questions (Final time) "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2019-03-18 16:20 +0100
            Re: Fstab Questions (Final time) Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2019-03-18 16:40 +0100
              Re: Fstab Questions (Final time) "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2019-03-18 19:40 +0100
                Re: Fstab Questions (Final time) Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2019-03-18 20:00 +0100
                Re: Fstab Questions (Final time) "Stephen P. Molnar" <s.molnar@sbcglobal.net> - 2019-03-18 20:50 +0100
          Re: Fstab Questions (Final time) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2019-03-18 16:40 +0100
      Re: Fstab Questions (Final time) Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2019-03-18 15:00 +0100
        Re: Fstab Questions (Final time) rhkramer@gmail.com - 2019-03-18 16:30 +0100

csiph-web