Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.security > #5495

u+S WAS: Which one is better solution?

From Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl>
Newsgroups linux.debian.security
Subject u+S WAS: Which one is better solution?
Date 2018-12-16 10:20 +0100
Message-ID <x5AKB-7PL-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <x5g9c-3HC-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <x5giS-3L0-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <x5kZb-6Cz-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <x5zvc-6X9-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 08:54:05AM +0100, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> On 15.12.18 17:24, Ruslanas G??ibovskis wrote:
> > u+S on a scr
> 
> what is u+S?
 
Probably 'u+S' as in `chmod u+S scr`

Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Which one is better solution? JungHwan Kang <ultractgm@gmail.com> - 2018-12-15 12:20 +0100
  Re: Which one is better solution? Shea Alterio <krusete@gmail.com> - 2018-12-15 12:30 +0100
    Re: Which one is better solution? Ruslanas Gžibovskis <ruslanas@lpic.lt> - 2018-12-15 17:30 +0100
      Re: Which one is better solution? Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2018-12-15 22:30 +0100
      Re: Which one is better solution? Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@gmail.com> - 2018-12-16 09:00 +0100
        u+S  WAS: Which one is better solution? Geert Stappers <stappers@stappers.nl> - 2018-12-16 10:20 +0100

csiph-web