Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #9950
| From | Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: Do we need embargoes for GPL compliance issues? |
| Date | 2018-09-12 22:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wxkfg-3wt-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <wxiZP-2Rt-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <wxk5A-3t1-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
* Jonathan Carter: > Having said all of that, I don't know of any case where Debian has > specifically named and shamed anyone regarding such a violation, but I > also don't see a reason why Debian should explicitly try to keep those > secret for no good reason. The main advantage for Debian would be to retain licenses for GPLv3 software, despite the occasional accidental violation and the time needed to clean up one. However, the most likely source of accidental violations is the Linux kernel (because it will increasingly end up in firmware blobs where the upstream submitter claims they are non-free but redistributable). Non-cooperative developers are unlikely to participate in the Common Cure movement anyway, so the whole thing is perhaps moot.
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Do we need embargoes for GPL compliance issues? Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2018-09-12 21:30 +0200
Re: Do we need embargoes for GPL compliance issues? Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> - 2018-09-12 22:40 +0200
Re: Do we need embargoes for GPL compliance issues? Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2018-09-12 22:50 +0200
Re: Do we need embargoes for GPL compliance issues? Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2018-09-13 01:00 +0200
Re: Do we need embargoes for GPL compliance issues? Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2018-09-13 01:10 +0200
Re: Do we need embargoes for GPL compliance issues? Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2018-09-13 04:00 +0200
Re: Do we need embargoes for GPL compliance issues? Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2018-09-13 05:50 +0200
Re: Do we need embargoes for GPL compliance issues? Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2018-09-13 06:40 +0200
Re: Do we need embargoes for GPL compliance issues? Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2018-09-13 07:20 +0200
Re: Do we need embargoes for GPL compliance issues? Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2018-09-13 07:50 +0200
Re: Do we need embargoes for GPL compliance issues? Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2018-09-13 08:00 +0200
Re: Do we need embargoes for GPL compliance issues? Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2018-09-13 18:10 +0200
Re: Do we need embargoes for GPL compliance issues? Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2018-09-13 18:50 +0200
Re: Do we need embargoes for GPL compliance issues? Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2018-09-14 03:30 +0200
Re: Do we need embargoes for GPL compliance issues? Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2018-09-17 13:50 +0200
Re: Do we need embargoes for GPL compliance issues? Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> - 2018-09-17 22:00 +0200
so-called "Common Cure" provision, GPL enforcement within Debian, Patrick McHardy's enforcement, etc. (was Re: Do we need embargoes for GPL compliance issues?) "Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn@sfconservancy.org> - 2018-09-20 00:20 +0200
csiph-web