Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #10807

Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Le mercredi 15 août 2018 à 15:11:25+0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue a écrit :
> Le mercredi 15 août 2018 à 13:10:39+0200, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> > Pierre-Elliott Bécue, le mer. 15 août 2018 13:05:09 +0200, a ecrit:
> > >  2. What's the proper way to handle such packages?
> > 
> > Build profiles? You can annotate the build-dep needed for check with
> > <!nocheck> so that one can easily (re)bootstrap the circle at any time
> > by using DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck dpkg-buildpackage -Pnocheck
> 
> Thanks, I'll dig the wiki pages and try this!
> 
> Cheers!

Hi,

So I found a way to build locally, using your suggestions. In my case I
guess I could upload directly the output of the nocheck build as the bin
package isn't altered.

But how should I handle the upload in the archive in a general case? Let's
imagine my profile produces a different bin package, eg if foo -> bar (for
specific foo functionalities) -> foo, so with a stage1 foo, then a stage1
bar and then a stage2 foo, how should I proceed? Do all the builds locally
and upload the packages obtained from the last build?

On the other hand, let's assume one wants to do a sourceful upload, and not
upload the .deb files (I know this is not possible when one introduces a new
package in the archive), then the buildd farm couldn't succeed because the
nocheck wouldn't be taken into account. So this means profile builds
systematically require source + binary upload?

Maybe some of these questions may seem dumb, but I'd rather ask them than
upload shit to the archive. ^^

Thanks. :)

-- 
Pierre-Elliott Bécue
GPG: 9AE0 4D98 6400 E3B6 7528  F493 0D44 2664 1949 74E2
It's far easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package Pierre-Elliott Bécue <becue@crans.org> - 2018-08-15 13:10 +0200
  Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com> - 2018-08-15 13:20 +0200
  Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> - 2018-08-15 13:20 +0200
    Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package Pierre-Elliott Bécue <becue@crans.org> - 2018-08-15 15:20 +0200
      Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package Pierre-Elliott Bécue <becue@crans.org> - 2018-08-15 15:50 +0200
        Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> - 2018-08-15 17:40 +0200
      Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2018-08-20 16:30 +0200
        Re: Best way to handle circular build deps to make a pypy- package Pierre-Elliott Bécue <becue@crans.org> - 2018-08-20 18:50 +0200

csiph-web