Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #198200
| From | Taren <taren@earthlink.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Kernel compilation problem |
| Date | 2018-08-02 21:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wiqZk-2hl-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <wiev8-3dY-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <wioNP-13P-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
I did finally get the 4.17.11 kernel to compile so that my large drives are visible now, but I had to use a 'shotgun' approach in including as many SCSI/SATA/etc variables as possible. I do intend on comparing the non-functioning config for 4.17.11 against both the functioning config, as well as against the config for 4.9.0-7-amd. Thanks. Taren On 08/02/2018 10:30 AM, David Wright wrote: > On Wed 01 Aug 2018 at 23:37:33 (-0600), Taren wrote: >> I'm running Stretch, with kernel 4.9.0.7, and am trying to compile a >> new kernel (preferably 4.17.11) into which I can boot. >> The kernel builds successfully, but whenever I try booting into the >> new kernel, I end up in emergency mode, with the error >> >> Unit dev-disk-by\x2duuid-<uuid>.device has failed. >> >> The result is timeout. >> >> This device is anmd device, with two mirrors (each 2.7T in size). >> The submirrors are present when I boot into 4.9.0.7 (installed when >> the system was built). >> However, they do not appear to be visible under any kernel which I >> build and try to boot into. >> >> I've tried setting LBDAF in the kernel configuration, but that >> requires that a 32bit kernel be built (and x64 deselected), and I'm >> running on an AMD 8350 chip, which is x86_64. >> Kernel 4.9.0.7 does not have LBDAF set (and x64 is set), yet it's >> able to see my 2.7T drives, and my raid device mounts with no >> problem. > I think this is a red herring. 32bit kernels need LBDAF for large > disks because they have to be told to use 64bit addressing for > them. Obviously 64bit kernels don't need telling, so that option > is made unavailable. > >> Would someone point me in the correct direction for configuring a >> new kernel, so that my 2T+ drives are visible? > In the absence of other replies, I can only suggest > (a) comparing /boot/config-4.9.0-7-amd64 with the one you've > built to see whether something is missing, > (b) compare the output of lsinitramfs /boot/initrd.img-4.9.0-7-amd64 > with the one you've built to see likewise. > I'm assuming with (b) that the disks have to be found by using the > initramfs before the system can continue booting with the filesystem > contained on those disks. > > Cheers, > David. > >
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Kernel compilation problem Taren <taren@earthlink.net> - 2018-08-02 07:40 +0200
Re: Kernel compilation problem Taren <taren@earthlink.net> - 2018-08-02 14:00 +0200
Re: Kernel compilation problem David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-08-02 18:40 +0200
Re: Kernel compilation problem Taren <taren@earthlink.net> - 2018-08-02 21:00 +0200
csiph-web