Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #202280
| From | Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome |
| Date | 2018-11-09 12:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <wSdsu-8qK-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <wRyfD-8l9-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <wRHLX-5Dq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <wRUSR-5hJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <wRV2x-5As-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <wS4yR-2Ni-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 11:12:29AM +0900, John Crawley wrote: >Can a package depend on a non-existant virtual package? It can, but this is likely a bug if it happens. >Is x-www-browser due to be added to the official Debian virtual >package list? I'm advocating for x-www-browser to exist, but haven't done the work to make it so. Note that the authorative list of virtual package names in policy is out of date. (I have some other ideas about fixing that which I want to pick up too) >At the moment www-browser is a virtual package, but not a registered >Debian alternative, while x-www-browser is an alternative but not a >VP. :| www-browser is an alternative, provided by (at least) lynx. >I suppose a workaround for the LXDE package would be to depend >on/recommend/suggest any of a list of usable X browsers, like: >Suggests: firefox | firefox-esr | chromium ... >The choice of safe possibilities for that list might be quite limited. Yes, but that is effectively doing the work of defining a virtual package but in the LXDE dependencies. We might as well do it properly and in the right place from the start. >BTW if a package ships a .desktop file evoking x-www-browser, is it >not obliged to Depend on (rather than Recommend/Suggest) a package >which provides that alternative? Or would a TryExec field in the >.desktop file be enough to cover it? Personally I agree that this should be a Depends:. I'm not sure the LXDE maintainers agree. I think Recommends: would be acceptable *if* LXDE's behaviour was to not show the button/shortcut if the path it was pointing at was non-existent (perhaps this is achieved via TryExec=). But that's not the current behaviour. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome David Parker <dparker@utica.edu> - 2018-11-05 18:00 +0100
Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-11-05 18:10 +0100
Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2018-11-05 18:10 +0100
Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome David Parker <dparker@utica.edu> - 2018-11-05 20:30 +0100
Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-11-05 20:40 +0100
Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome Ben Caradoc-Davies <ben@transient.nz> - 2018-11-05 20:50 +0100
Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome John Crawley <john@bunsenlabs.org> - 2018-11-06 03:20 +0100
Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-11-06 13:50 +0100
Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-11-06 16:00 +0100
Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-11-07 16:50 +0100
Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome John Crawley <john@bunsenlabs.org> - 2018-11-08 03:00 +0100
Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-11-08 17:00 +0100
Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-11-08 17:10 +0100
Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome John Crawley <john@bunsenlabs.org> - 2018-11-09 03:20 +0100
Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-11-09 12:50 +0100
Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome Jonathan Dowland <jmtd@debian.org> - 2018-11-09 12:50 +0100
Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome John Crawley <john@bunsenlabs.org> - 2018-11-26 10:50 +0100
Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome Liam O'Toole <liam.p.otoole@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 03:10 +0100
Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-11-06 09:50 +0100
Re: Removing firefox-esr also removes gnome Cindy-Sue Causey <butterflybytes@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 20:10 +0100
csiph-web