Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.security > #5467

Re: Gaps in security coverage?

From Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.security
Subject Re: Gaps in security coverage?
Date 2018-11-06 23:30 +0100
Message-ID <wRi1b-77w-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <wQO37-64W-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Cocytus

Show all headers | View raw


John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> schrieb:

Hi John,

> So I recently started running debsecan on one of my boxes.

debsecan hasn't seen any feature work for about a decade and is
far too noisy to the point of being useless these days.

> It's a
> fairly barebones server install, uses unattended-upgrades and is fully
> up-to-date.  I expected a clean bill of health, but didn't get that.  I
> got pages and pages and pages of output.  Some of it (especially kernel
> related) I believe may be false positives, but not all.  Some of it
> simply isn't patched yet.

No distro backports everything, that would be outright insane :-)
As such there's no clean bill of health. We look at everything and if it's
important enough it gets fixed via security.debian.org and if not, via
point releases or not at all (there's plenty of cases where the tradeoff
of changing stable clearly balances towards not fixing stuff!)

E.g. your specific example of busybox/CVE-2011-5325 is fixed in the
upcoming stretch point release.

> Marked fixed in jessie

After introducing a regression (https://packages.qa.debian.org/b/busybox/news/20180803T045026Z.html)
which is a good example of the balance I mentioned above.

> 2) If so, what kinds of volunteering would be appreciated?

Sure! If you tell us what languages you feel comfortable to backport
security fixes in, I'm sure we can find you some tasks to work
on, best to reply to the team alias (team@security.debian.org)
and can pick it up from there.

Thanks,
        Moritz

Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Gaps in security coverage? John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> - 2018-11-05 15:30 +0100
  Re: Gaps in security coverage? Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2018-11-06 02:40 +0100
    Re: Gaps in security coverage? John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> - 2018-11-06 04:00 +0100
      Re: Gaps in security coverage? Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2018-11-06 07:50 +0100
        Re: Gaps in security coverage? Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2018-11-06 12:10 +0100
          Re: Gaps in security coverage? Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2018-11-06 12:50 +0100
        Re: Gaps in security coverage? Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> - 2018-11-06 12:10 +0100
    Re: Gaps in security coverage? Davide Prina <davide.prina@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 20:20 +0100
  Re: Gaps in security coverage? Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2018-11-06 23:30 +0100
    Re: Gaps in security coverage? Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2018-11-07 00:20 +0100

csiph-web