Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #201423
| From | Doug <dmcgarrett@optonline.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: basilisk-browser |
| Date | 2018-10-19 01:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wKq3v-3WX-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <wKb4t-36V-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <wKbxv-3wD-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <wKcjU-3Na-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 10/18/2018 04:49 AM, Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:02:42AM +0200, tomas@tuxteam.de wrote: >>> I think its an good alternative to Firefox Quantum. >>> >>> More Infos here: https://www.basilisk-browser.org/ >> Indeed, it does look good. > No, it does not. UXP means Palemoon Browser. > Palemoon means extremely hostile upstream - [1]. > > Does Debian project really needs yet another Iceweasel incident? > > Reco > > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86 > > I would like to know what you mean by "extremely hostile upstream"-- I have been using PaleMoon Browser for several years and I like it. Unlike Firefox, it doesn't change its stripes every few weeks. I am happy with an app that retains its interface for years and years and doesn't mess with my head. YMMV. --doug
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
basilisk-browser basti <mailinglist@unix-solution.de> - 2018-10-18 09:40 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-10-18 10:10 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-10-18 11:00 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2018-10-18 11:20 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2018-10-18 14:50 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-10-18 16:40 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser basti <mailinglist@unix-solution.de> - 2018-10-18 17:00 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-10-18 17:10 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser John Crawley <john@bunsenlabs.org> - 2018-10-19 03:00 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser Doug <dmcgarrett@optonline.net> - 2018-10-19 01:40 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2018-10-19 06:30 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-10-19 12:40 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-10-19 08:40 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser Dominik George <natureshadow@debian.org> - 2018-10-19 09:00 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2018-10-19 09:30 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-10-19 12:30 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser mick crane <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2018-10-19 13:10 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser Gene Heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2018-10-19 12:50 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-10-19 11:30 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2018-10-19 15:40 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2018-10-20 04:20 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser fmneto@fmneto.com.br - 2018-10-20 05:00 +0200
Re: basilisk-browser Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@debian.org> - 2018-10-20 14:00 +0200
csiph-web