Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #200931
| From | Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: dual port cross over cable bonding |
| Date | 2018-10-05 16:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wFzAt-2Hd-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <wFzqN-2E2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <wFzAt-2Hd-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <wFzAt-2Hd-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 03:45:14PM +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote: > Yes, 192.168.200.1 and 192.168.200.2 netmask 30 > All ports and cables work when tested 1-1 but not with my 2-2 bonding > config. > > > Looks like your LACP is correct but your IP addressing is wrong. > > > > Do you have parentheses in it, or are you trying to suggest that > > one is .1 and the other is .2? Also, balance-rr is in conflict with layer3+4. -dsr-
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
dual port cross over cable bonding Adam Weremczuk <adamw@matrixscience.com> - 2018-10-05 16:40 +0200
Re: dual port cross over cable bonding Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-10-05 16:50 +0200
Re: dual port cross over cable bonding Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-10-05 16:50 +0200
[SOLVED] Re: dual port cross over cable bonding Adam Weremczuk <adamw@matrixscience.com> - 2018-10-05 17:20 +0200
Re: dual port cross over cable bonding Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-10-05 16:50 +0200
Re: dual port cross over cable bonding Adam Weremczuk <adamw@matrixscience.com> - 2018-10-05 17:10 +0200
Re: dual port cross over cable bonding Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-10-05 17:20 +0200
Re: dual port cross over cable bonding Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-10-05 17:20 +0200
[SOLVED] Re: dual port cross over cable bonding Adam Weremczuk <adamw@matrixscience.com> - 2018-10-05 17:50 +0200
csiph-web