Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #200940
| From | Adam Weremczuk <adamw@matrixscience.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | [SOLVED] Re: dual port cross over cable bonding |
| Date | 2018-10-05 17:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wFAwx-3fG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <wFzqN-2E2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <wFA3w-363-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Matrix Science Ltd |
A single dual port gigabit card on each server. I'm more concerned about performance than redundancy. The bond operates in 2 gigabit mode: ethtool bond1 (...) Speed: 2000Mb/s Duplex: Full (...) My working config (will play with it a bit more): auto bond1 iface bond1 inet static slaves ens1f0 ens1f1 address 192.168.200.1 netmask 255.255.255.252 bond_miimon 100 bond_mode balance-rr bond_xmit_hash_policy layer3+4 I've done a simple some performance test - copied a file over ssh (which adds own overhead). 90-100 MB/s over a single link and 150-160MB/s over a dual bond So it's definitely working and making a substantial difference. Unplugging one cable doesn't break the transfer; speed temporarily decreases but then goes up again after cable is reinserted. On 05/10/18 16:01, Dan Purgert wrote: > Are these "just" 10/100 cards? I mean, if they're gbit capable, > crossover cables violate the spec, and you're limiting them to 100m > only... >
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
dual port cross over cable bonding Adam Weremczuk <adamw@matrixscience.com> - 2018-10-05 16:40 +0200
Re: dual port cross over cable bonding Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-10-05 16:50 +0200
Re: dual port cross over cable bonding Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-10-05 16:50 +0200
[SOLVED] Re: dual port cross over cable bonding Adam Weremczuk <adamw@matrixscience.com> - 2018-10-05 17:20 +0200
Re: dual port cross over cable bonding Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2018-10-05 16:50 +0200
Re: dual port cross over cable bonding Adam Weremczuk <adamw@matrixscience.com> - 2018-10-05 17:10 +0200
Re: dual port cross over cable bonding Reco <recoverym4n@enotuniq.net> - 2018-10-05 17:20 +0200
Re: dual port cross over cable bonding Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-10-05 17:20 +0200
[SOLVED] Re: dual port cross over cable bonding Adam Weremczuk <adamw@matrixscience.com> - 2018-10-05 17:50 +0200
csiph-web