Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #200420
| From | steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: [SOLVED] Re: Yet another UEFI/BIOS question |
| Date | 2018-09-22 10:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <wALLY-2nD-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <wAbSa-6CR-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <wAngC-4Xl-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <wAylH-32Y-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <wAIbo-fY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <wAL9f-2ba-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Le 22-09-2018, à 10:07:36 +0200, Pascal Hambourg a écrit : >Le 22/09/2018 à 06:58, steve a écrit : >> >>>>Because what I finally did is install a fresh Debian on another device >>>>(using GPT) and the ACPI errors still were there. >>> >>>In legacy mode (with a BIOS boot partition) or EFI mode (with an >>>EFI system partition) ? >> >>In EFI mode. The "Bios" is now fully in EFI mode and it sees all my boot >>disks. > >Ok. I expected (with little hope though) that the errors might have >disappeared when booting in native EFI mode, not because you converted >disks to GPT. Me too, but no chance, always the same errors. I guess it's not related to kernel (4.18 from backports) but to Bios firmware (up to date). All I can hope now is that they correct it. Nevertheless it doesn't to affect the system (or if it does, it's so subtil that I just can't notice it). >>>>I used the opportunity of having another Debian to convert my sda disk >>>>to GPT tables, and change the BIOS setting to UEFI only (just for the >>>>sake of it). So all my disk have a GPT partition table except for the 3 >>>>ones for the RAID1 array. Not sure whether I can use the same >>>>manipulations to convert them to GPT also. But since they work fine, I >>>>might leave it as it is. >>> >>>You can, but IMO it provides little value. GPT is useful in the >>>following cases : >>>- disk bigger that 2 TiB >> >>Might come sooner or later. > >When it comes you'll use GPT on the new big disks. No need to convert >the old smaller ones. Well I did, with no problem. Now all my 8 disks have GPT partition tables. >>I think I'll do that so to have 100% GPT disks and leave the past where >>it is and prepare the future. But this step worries me a bit because I >>have all my personal data on one of the RAID1 and really don't want to >>loose them. I think best would be to backup those data elsewhere in case >>things go wrong. > >1) Backup valuable data. RAID does not replace backups. I know, but I rely on that, and I have a spare disk in case things go the bad way. I have to put in place a procedure to do a real backup on my freenas. >2) Hey ! This is RAID 1. You have redundancy. You can convert one disk >at a time, and if things go wrong, you can just rebuild it. > >Note however that there is a small chance that a disk cannot be >converted to GPT as is. The GPT primary and backup partition tables >requires a few unallocated sectors (33 for a default 128-entry table) >at the beginning and at the end of the disk. If sectors in these areas >are allocated to partitions, the conversion is not possible. Well, they didn't, all went fine. Thanks for your help ! Have a nice week-end. Steve
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Yet another UEFI/BIOS question steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2018-09-19 17:00 +0200
Re: Yet another UEFI/BIOS question Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2018-09-19 17:30 +0200
Re: Yet another UEFI/BIOS question steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2018-09-19 18:00 +0200
Re: Yet another UEFI/BIOS question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2018-09-19 23:40 +0200
Re: Yet another UEFI/BIOS question steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2018-09-20 09:00 +0200
Re: Yet another UEFI/BIOS question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2018-09-20 20:30 +0200
[SOLVED] Re: Yet another UEFI/BIOS question steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2018-09-21 08:40 +0200
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Yet another UEFI/BIOS question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2018-09-21 20:30 +0200
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Yet another UEFI/BIOS question steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2018-09-22 07:00 +0200
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Yet another UEFI/BIOS question Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2018-09-22 10:10 +0200
Re: [SOLVED] Re: Yet another UEFI/BIOS question steve <dlist@bluewin.ch> - 2018-09-22 10:50 +0200
And yet another UEFI/BIOS question: Work on both. Wayne Sallee <Wayne@WayneSallee.com> - 2018-09-23 17:00 +0200
Re: And yet another UEFI/BIOS question: Work on both. Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 18:20 +0200
Re: And yet another UEFI/BIOS question: Work on both. Wayne Sallee <Wayne@WayneSallee.com> - 2018-09-23 23:30 +0200
Re: And yet another UEFI/BIOS question: Work on both. Patrick Bartek <nemommxiv@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 03:00 +0200
Re: And yet another UEFI/BIOS question: Work on both. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-09-24 21:20 +0200
Re: And yet another UEFI/BIOS question: Work on both. Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org> - 2018-09-24 21:30 +0200
Re: And yet another UEFI/BIOS question: Work on both. Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2018-09-27 15:10 +0200
Re: And yet another UEFI/BIOS question: Work on both. David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-09-23 20:40 +0200
csiph-web