Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #906034
| From | Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@kleine-koenig.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#768319: #768319 mumudvb version |
| Date | 2018-07-04 15:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <w7Py1-y3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tB7Jn-3F8-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tEhsR-62y-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ojvLr-6bh-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tEhsR-62y-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Cc += people being listed on https://salsa.debian.org/groups/vdr-team/-/group_members Hello, On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 03:57:01PM -0400, Brice Dubost wrote: > Yes this is true and infortunate. If you know a package maintainer I > will be happy to help him. Given that I'm interested in a package for a version of mumudvb that supports dvb-t2. Browsing through the history of mumudvb.git it seems it would be enough to bump to 1.7.2, but I wonder if it would be sensible to go to 2.0 directly. What do you think? Best regards Uwe
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#768319: #768319 mumudvb version Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@kleine-koenig.org> - 2018-07-04 15:00 +0200
csiph-web