Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.theory > #118760
| From | dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory |
| Subject | Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met |
| Date | 2025-05-12 20:12 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vvu2q2$1c062$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <vvttf7$1bfib$1@dont-email.me> <vvu008$1c062$1@dont-email.me> <vvu0mm$1c0vi$1@dont-email.me> <vvu0si$1c062$2@dont-email.me> <vvu1m8$1c86j$1@dont-email.me> |
On 5/12/2025 7:53 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 5/12/2025 6:40 PM, dbush wrote:
>> On 5/12/2025 7:36 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 5/12/2025 6:24 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>> On 5/12/2025 6:41 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 5/12/2025 5:30 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/12/2025 6:28 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/12/2025 4:54 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2025 5:46 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2025 4:39 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2025 5:12 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2025 3:29 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2025 4:17 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2025 2:53 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2025 2:27 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2025 1:20 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2025 2:17 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Introduction to the Theory of Computation 3rd Edition
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Michael Sipser (Author)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.4 out of 5 stars 568 rating
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Theory-Computation-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michael- Sipser/ dp/113318779X
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> int DD()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if (Halt_Status)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HERE: goto HERE;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return Halt_Status;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DD correctly simulated by any pure simulator
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> named HHH cannot possibly terminate thus proving
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that this criteria has been met:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> words 10/13/2022>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> input D until H correctly determines that its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simulated D
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would never stop running unless aborted then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> H can abort its simulation of D and correctly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> report that D
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> words 10/13/2022>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which is not what you thought he agreed to:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 2:41:27 PM UTC-5, Ben
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bacarisse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I exchanged emails with him about this. He does not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agree with anything
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > substantive that PO has written. I won't quote him,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as I don't have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > permission, but he was, let's say... forthright, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his reply to me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Ben already acknowledged that the requirements have been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> met*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/17/2022 10:23 AM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > ...D(D) would not halt unless H stops the simulation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > H /can/ correctly determine this silly criterion (in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this one case)...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which is not what Sipser agreed to, as stated above.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He agreed, as all others would, that H must determine if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UTM(D) halts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is not what Ben's words mean.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/14/2022 7:44 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I don't think that is the shell game. PO really /has/ an H
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > (it's trivial to do for this one case) that correctly
>>>>>>>>>>>>> determines
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > that P(P) *would* never stop running *unless* aborted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 10/13/2022>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> H correctly determines that its simulated D
>>>>>>>>>>>>> would never stop running unless aborted...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *its simulated D*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Which Sipser (and everyone else) takes to mean UTM(D),
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *its simulated D* cannot be *correctly* understood
>>>>>>>>>>> to mean a D simulated by anything else other than
>>>>>>>>>>> a hypothetical H that never aborts.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> False. It cannot be *correctly* understood to be anything
>>>>>>>>>> else but the algorithm D simulated completely by a UTM,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> An H that never aborts <is> a UTM.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In which case you don't have algorithm D. You instead have
>>>>>>>> algorithm Dn.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *its simulated D would never stop running unless aborted*
>>>>>>> can only mean one thing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And what it means is changing the input.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changing the input is not allowed.
>>>>>
>>>>> So professor Sisper was wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> He didn't agree to what you think he did:
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 2:41:27 PM UTC-5, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>>> > I exchanged emails with him about this. He does not agree with
>>>> anything
>>>> > substantive that PO has written. I won't quote him, as I don't have
>>>> > permission, but he was, let's say... forthright, in his reply to me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/23/2024 5:07 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>>>> > I suspect he was tricked because PO used H and D as the names
>>>> without
>>>> > making it clear that D was constructed from H in the usual way
>>>> (Sipser
>>>> > uses H and D in at least one of his proofs). Of course, he is
>>>> clued in
>>>> > enough know that, if D is indeed constructed from H like that, the
>>>> > "minor remark" becomes true by being a hypothetical: if the moon
>>>> is made
>>>> > of cheese, the Martians can look forward to a fine fondue. But,
>>>> > personally, I think the professor is more straight talking than
>>>> that,
>>>> > and he simply took as a method that can work for some inputs.
>>>> That's
>>>> > the only way is could be seen as a "minor remark" with being
>>>> accused of
>>>> > being disingenuous.
>>>>
>>>> On 8/23/2024 9:10 PM, Mike Terry wrote:
>>>> > So that PO will have no cause to quote me as supporting his case:
>>>> what
>>>> > Sipser understood he was agreeing to was NOT what PO interprets
>>>> it as
>>>> > meaning. Sipser would not agree that the conclusion applies in PO's
>>>> > HHH(DDD) scenario, where DDD halts.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This can only have one meaning:
>>> *its simulated D would never stop running unless aborted*
>>
>> And that meaning is "changing the input"
>>
>> Changing the input is not allowed.
>
> Simulating Termination analyzers cannot possibly report
> on the actual behavior of non-terminating inputs
> because this would cause themselves to never terminate.
>
> They must always hypothesize what the behavior of the
> input would be if they themselves never aborted.
>
False. They must always hypothesize what the behavior of algorithm
described by the input would be if it was executed directly, as per the
requirements:
Given any algorithm (i.e. a fixed immutable sequence of instructions) X
described as <X> with input Y:
A solution to the halting problem is an algorithm H that computes the
following mapping:
(<X>,Y) maps to 1 if and only if X(Y) halts when executed directly
(<X>,Y) maps to 0 if and only if X(Y) does not halt when executed directly
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 13:17 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 14:20 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 13:27 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 15:53 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 15:17 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 16:29 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 16:12 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 17:39 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 16:46 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 17:54 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 17:28 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 18:30 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 17:41 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 19:24 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 18:36 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 19:40 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 18:53 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 20:12 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 19:25 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 20:27 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 19:34 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 20:36 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 19:56 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 21:00 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 20:06 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 21:15 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 21:45 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 21:01 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 22:22 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-13 00:25 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-13 06:11 +0100
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 00:22 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-05-13 08:44 +0000
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-13 10:02 +0100
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-13 07:15 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 11:28 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-05-13 09:09 +0000
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 21:46 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 22:58 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 22:22 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 23:31 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 00:14 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-13 13:43 +0200
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-13 07:23 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-13 00:02 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Complete Closure olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 00:03 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Complete Closure "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-13 13:38 +0200
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Complete Closure Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-13 07:33 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-12 22:54 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-05-13 09:18 +0000
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-13 13:43 +0300
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-12 21:30 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 22:47 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 23:50 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 23:28 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-14 13:24 +0200
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 10:40 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-15 13:13 +0200
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-14 07:00 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 10:55 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 16:54 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-14 21:47 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-15 10:44 +0300
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-15 22:10 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-16 12:05 +0300
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-16 10:02 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 08:26 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 10:16 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 16:46 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 15:52 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 17:22 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 16:53 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 17:58 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 17:28 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 20:34 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-15 10:51 +0300
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met +++ olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-15 22:17 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 23:26 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-14 07:01 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 10:54 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 16:54 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 08:25 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-12 21:27 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 21:53 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-13 00:05 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 23:52 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-13 13:33 +0200
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 19:41 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-14 07:03 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-13 07:43 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 16:30 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-05-13 21:39 +0000
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 16:52 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-13 18:35 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-05-14 14:26 +0000
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 10:04 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-15 13:10 +0200
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-13 18:33 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 21:07 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 20:27 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 21:31 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 20:48 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 21:54 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 20:57 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 21:59 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 21:47 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 22:50 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 22:25 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 23:36 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-14 07:20 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 10:45 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 16:51 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 16:01 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 17:25 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 16:57 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 18:01 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 17:20 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 20:32 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 19:34 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 20:45 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 14:31 -0700
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 17:08 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 16:43 -0700
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 18:57 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-15 13:04 +0200
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-05-15 00:39 +0100
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 18:52 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 17:11 -0700
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 19:24 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-05-15 01:48 +0100
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 20:01 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-15 13:01 +0200
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2025-05-15 03:08 +0100
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 21:22 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 21:23 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-14 23:08 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 23:11 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-15 07:08 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-14 23:06 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 23:07 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-15 12:55 +0200
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-15 07:12 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2025-05-15 01:36 +0100
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike's key mistake olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 19:47 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike's key mistake "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-15 12:52 +0200
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike's key mistake olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-16 00:29 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike's key mistake "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-16 22:06 +0200
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike's key mistake olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-16 15:29 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike's key mistake Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-16 18:03 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike's key mistake olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-16 17:39 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike's key mistake Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-16 20:38 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike's key mistake olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-16 19:49 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike's key mistake Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-16 22:50 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike's key mistake olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-16 22:08 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike's key mistake "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-17 11:03 +0200
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Dishonest reviewers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-17 13:45 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Dishonest reviewers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-17 16:01 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Dishonest reviewers Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-18 12:24 +0300
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Dishonest reviewers "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-18 12:15 +0200
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike's key mistake Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-17 09:08 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike's key mistake olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-17 10:36 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike's key mistake Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-17 15:51 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike's key mistake Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-18 12:35 +0300
Mike's big mistake about DD simulated by HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-15 21:39 -0500
Re: Mike's big mistake about DD simulated by HHH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-16 22:03 +0200
Re: Mike's big mistake about DD simulated by HHH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-16 16:10 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-16 12:26 +0300
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-16 09:47 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-05-17 11:55 +0300
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2025-05-17 15:27 +0100
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-17 11:09 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-17 10:31 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-17 15:54 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-17 15:05 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-17 16:10 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-17 15:18 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-17 16:34 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-17 15:16 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-17 16:31 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-17 16:00 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-17 19:35 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer Mr Flibble <flibble@red-dwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-05-17 23:56 +0000
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-17 19:05 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-18 12:26 +0200
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-18 07:15 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-18 07:14 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-17 19:00 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-18 12:22 +0200
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- Mike my best reviewer Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-18 07:20 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-14 07:15 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH joes <noreply@example.org> - 2025-05-14 14:32 +0000
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 10:11 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met --- WDH "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-15 12:47 +0200
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 08:54 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-14 07:22 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 10:44 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 16:50 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 15:57 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 17:23 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 16:54 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 18:00 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 17:37 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 20:36 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-14 22:32 +0100
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 17:10 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-05-14 23:17 +0100
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 17:25 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 20:34 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-13 22:42 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-14 13:19 +0200
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 10:48 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-15 13:15 +0200
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-14 07:27 -0400
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-05-14 10:37 -0500
Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2025-05-15 12:41 +0200
csiph-web