Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #886459
| From | Fabian Greffrath <fabian@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#892370: Aerial Bold chosen when it should not be |
| Date | 2018-03-11 21:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vsfiq-53R-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <vr5Eu-ab-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vsbot-2eP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <vr5Eu-ab-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vsbot-2eP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi guys, Am Sonntag, den 11.03.2018, 21:05 +0530 schrieb Vasudev Kamath: > Mean while any one else from fonts team have any idea on this issue?. > Is it related to fontconfig configurations? I don't think it is related to the fontconfig config file that we patch/ship, but have a look at this: fc-match -a aerial | head -n 2 Aerial.ttf: "sans" "Regular" AerialBd.ttf: "Aerial" "Bold" The regular variant doesn't identify itself as "Aerial" but merely as "sans", so the Bold variant is the first one known by the name "Aerial". Looks like the regular font is broken. Anyway, didn't we decide earlier in #872766 to drop this package from Debian altogether in favour of fonts-liberation or fonts-croscore?
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#892370: Aerial Bold chosen when it should not be Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org> - 2018-03-08 16:30 +0100
Bug#892370: Aerial Bold chosen when it should not be Vasudev Kamath <vasudev@copyninja.info> - 2018-03-11 16:50 +0100
Bug#892370: Aerial Bold chosen when it should not be Fabian Greffrath <fabian@debian.org> - 2018-03-11 21:00 +0100
csiph-web