Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #183079
| From | Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10 |
| Subject | Re: E-S |
| Date | 2025-03-30 21:21 +1100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vsb5vv$15u37$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <hk055lxv4l.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <vlp1ob$3ff03$1@dont-email.me> <m832ojlvd3g7c3aapefmlsfncnmd8t52tr@4ax.com> <vs5voe$2jj71$1@dont-email.me> <vs64ek$2nqae$1@dont-email.me> |
On 29/03/2025 12:24 am, Paul wrote: > On Fri, 3/28/2025 7:04 AM, Daniel70 wrote: >> On 10/01/2025 11:13 pm, John wrote: >>> On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 17:41:31 -0000 (UTC), Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: >> >> <Snip> >> >>>>> Better if you do YYYY. It makes easier for other people to recognize it >>>>> is a year. Once you know the first figure is the year, it is easy to >>>>> guess the rest. >>>> >>>> Fortunately there's an ISO standard for all of this: 8601 >>>> >>>> The valid format is YYYY-MM-DD or, optionally, YYYYMMDD. >>> >>> And, in a couple of years, that is going to be Y2000'ed. >>> >>> "The CHILDREN, THE CHILDREN, Won't *anyone* ever think of THE >>> *C*H*IIIIIIII*LLLLLLLL*DD*RRRR*EEEEEEEEE*NNNNNNNNNN???!!!!" >>> >>> Addendum: the day after the 31st of December, 9999, in case you're >>> still coffee deprived. >> >> "Y2000'ed" .... "9999"!! >> >> I have sever doubts about YOUR definition of "in a couple of years"!! ;-P > > That exceeds the "Best Before" date on the package. > > Even Dr.Pepper soda pop beverage does not last that long. > > Paul > How do you know, Paul?? Is there a warning on the "Dr Pepper" saying something like "Best Before 9999"?? ;-P -- Daniel70
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
E-S Jim the Geordie <jim@jimXscott.co.uk> - 2025-01-07 12:15 +0000
Re: E-S Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> - 2025-01-07 12:48 +0000
Re: E-S Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-01-07 08:02 -0500
Re: E-S "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-01-08 16:27 +0100
Re: E-S Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-01-08 11:17 -0500
Re: E-S Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 17:38 +0000
Re: E-S "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-01-08 13:35 -0500
Re: E-S Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-08 14:46 -0500
Re: E-S "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-01-10 20:28 +0100
Re: E-S Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-01-08 14:52 -0500
Re: E-S "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-09 04:11 -0800
Re: E-S "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-09 14:47 +0100
Re: E-S Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 17:41 +0000
Re: E-S John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2025-01-10 12:13 +0000
Re: E-S John <Man@the.keyboard> - 2025-01-10 12:17 +0000
Re: E-S Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-01-10 09:08 -0500
Re: E-S Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 16:29 +0000
Re: E-S Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-01-10 11:58 -0500
Re: E-S Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 18:34 +0000
Re: E-S Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-10 19:08 +0000
Re: E-S Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2025-01-11 08:57 -0700
Re: E-S Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-01-11 16:38 +0000
Re: E-S Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2025-01-12 10:45 -0700
Re: E-S Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-12 15:06 -0500
Re: E-S Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2025-01-13 09:39 -0700
Re: E-S Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-03-28 22:34 +1100
Re: E-S Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:11 -0500
Re: E-S Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-03-30 21:17 +1100
Re: E-S Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> - 2025-04-06 20:23 +0200
Re: E-S Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-03-28 22:21 +1100
Re: E-S Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-03-28 16:51 +0000
Re: E-S Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-03-30 21:18 +1100
Re: E-S Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> - 2025-04-06 20:07 +0200
Re: E-S Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid> - 2025-03-28 21:12 +0000
Re: E-S Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-03-28 22:04 +1100
Re: E-S Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-03-28 09:24 -0400
Re: E-S jerryab <jerryab@juno.com> - 2025-03-28 10:19 -0500
Re: E-S Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-03-30 21:21 +1100
Re: E-S "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-10 14:42 +0100
Re: E-S "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-01-10 20:29 +0100
Re: E-S "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-11 06:37 -0800
Re: E-S Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 16:29 -0600
Re: E-S "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-01-10 20:31 +0100
Re: E-S Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-07 13:42 +0000
Re: E-S "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-01-07 08:49 -0500
Re: E-S "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-07 06:08 -0800
Re: E-S Jim the Geordie <jim@jimXscott.co.uk> - 2025-01-07 14:28 +0000
Re: E-S Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-10 10:43 -0500
Re: E-S "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 01:24 +0800
Re: E-S Jim the Geordie <jim@jimXscott.co.uk> - 2025-01-14 13:32 +0000
csiph-web