Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #193550

Re: dnsmasq and SOA

From Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: dnsmasq and SOA
Date 2018-03-09 08:40 +0100
Message-ID <vrkNb-1WT-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <voq2P-7rw-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <vqODE-5Fx-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <vqZz3-4EM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <vr7ZE-1w8-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <vrg6R-72t-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


	Hi.

On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 03:34:27AM +0100, Jacques Rodary wrote:
> > Today "dig in soa rodary.net" gives me:
> > rodary.net.             600     IN      SOA     . root.ns.rodary.net.
> > 2018022801 10800 3600 10800 600
> > Which is neither the answer I had  yesterday, neither yours (by the way
> > I don't find how to use the "dig +trace" command), and "dig in ns
> > rodary.net" which gave me ns.rodary.net and ns6.gandi.net , gives me
> > only ns.rodary.net now, and "dig in ns/soa rodary.net @ns6.gandi.net"
> > has no answer, but "recursion requested but not available"
> > > Did your previous BIND configuration implement DNSSEC?
> No
> ns6.gandi.net was NS in my main zone file; so I think I will try
> auth-sec-servers=ns6.gandi.net as it was in my BIND setup. I did and it 
> worked: "dig in soa  rodary.net" gives me:
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> rodary.net.             600     IN      SOA     . root.ns.rodary.net.
> 2018022801 10800 3600 10800 600
> 
> ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
> rodary.net.             600     IN      NS      .
> rodary.net.             600     IN      NS      ns6.gandi.net.

Hate to break it to you, but it seems to fail for everyone else.
Today "dig in soa rodary.net" gives me SERVFAIL.


> and even if I don't quite understand why "." (the root) is my secondary
> server, I suppose it means  I succeeded to have my host as a stealth server!

I believe that it means that somehow you're announcing authority on root
domain. I would advise against it.
"dig +trace" gives me "BAD REFERRAL", which is not a good sign, to say the
least.


> But when I added "auth-peer=217.70.177.40"  I had to restart everything,
> which means reboot for me because I don't understand quite well how
> NetworkManager works.

I don't understand it either, but frankly I don't need to. IP adresses,
routing table and packet flow are the state of the kernel. Using
always-running userland tool for their configuration *may* be
appropriate in certain cases (DHCP, anyone?), but for your typical
server environment such cases do not apply.
That said, for your typical server environment nothing beats ifupdown.
So my advice is - if you need a predictable behaviour - you exterminate
NetworkManager, connman and other fancy toys, and stick to the ifupdown,
or maybe systemd-networkd.

Reco

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Issues while installing Debian 啊肥坚lolz <rex12425@gmail.com> - 2018-02-19 18:10 +0100
  Re: Issues while installing Debian Hans <hans.ullrich@loop.de> - 2018-02-19 18:10 +0100
  Re: Issues while installing Debian Raju Devidas <rajudev@disroot.org> - 2018-02-19 19:00 +0100
  dnsmasq and SOA RODARY Jacques <rodaryj@free.fr> - 2018-02-28 01:30 +0100
    Re: dnsmasq and SOA Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2018-02-28 06:50 +0100
      Re: Re: dnsmasq and SOA RODARY Jacques <rodaryj@free.fr> - 2018-03-01 02:10 +0100
        Re: Re: dnsmasq and SOA Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2018-03-01 07:40 +0100
          Re: dnsmasq and SOA Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-03-02 22:00 +0100
            Re: Re: dnsmasq and SOA RODARY Jacques <rodaryj@free.fr> - 2018-03-06 03:00 +0100
              Re: Re: dnsmasq and SOA Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 07:30 +0100
          Re: Re: Re: dnsmasq and SOA RODARY Jacques <rodaryj@free.fr> - 2018-03-07 22:20 +0100
            Re: Re: Re: dnsmasq and SOA Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 10:00 +0100
              Re: dnsmasq and SOA Jacques Rodary <rodaryj@free.fr> - 2018-03-08 19:00 +0100
                Re: dnsmasq and SOA Jacques Rodary <rodaryj@free.fr> - 2018-03-09 03:40 +0100
                Re: dnsmasq and SOA Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 08:40 +0100
                Re: dnsmasq and SOA Jacques Rodary <rodaryj@free.fr> - 2018-03-09 18:30 +0100
                Re: dnsmasq and SOA Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 19:30 +0100

csiph-web