Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #122003

Re: neos Universal Compiler

From Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++, comp.theory
Subject Re: neos Universal Compiler
Date 2025-03-19 15:07 +0000
Organization Fix this later
Message-ID <vremit$128hv$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <KasCP.428197$NN2a.142078@fx15.ams4> <vrdvve$g2lm$1@dont-email.me> <jDACP.23625$dBr6.13222@fx04.ams4> <vrel2u$12kpa$1@dont-email.me> <VKACP.290828$7Fq7.268982@fx13.ams4>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 19/03/2025 14:44, Mr Flibble wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 14:41:34 +0000, Muttley wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 14:35:59 GMT Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp>
>> wibbled:
>>> On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 08:41:18 +0000, Muttley wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 04:59:22 GMT Mr Flibble
>>>> <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp>
>>>> wibbled:
>>>>> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:21:34 +0000, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Introducing the universal compiler, neos, that can compile ANY
>>>>>> programming language.
>>>>
>>>> I hope you're going to write a auto generator for that mess possibly
>>>> based on written instructions in english/french/whatever. Its
>>>> unreadable.
>>>
>>> eh? the neos grammar is based on EBNF so is human friendly.
>>
>> Its almost a solid slab of text.
> 
> It is based on EBNF so is human friendly.

It's human friendly because Flibber says so. Flibber is never 
wrong, not even when he's wrong.

And because magic, neos can (present tense) compile any 
programming language, even though most languages have no schema 
at present. We know this because Flibber is never wrong.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

neos Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-03-17 17:21 +0000
  Re: neos Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-03-19 04:59 +0000
    Re: neos Universal Compiler Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-19 08:41 +0000
      Re: neos Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-03-19 14:35 +0000
        Re: neos Universal Compiler Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-19 14:41 +0000
          Re: neos Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-03-19 14:44 +0000
            Re: neos Universal Compiler Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-19 15:07 +0000
              Re: neos Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-03-19 15:16 +0000
                Re: neos Universal Compiler Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-19 15:46 +0000
                Re: neos Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-03-19 15:48 +0000
                Re: neos Universal Compiler Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-19 16:29 +0000
                Re: neos Universal Compiler Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-19 17:20 +0000
                Re: neos Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> - 2025-03-19 17:26 +0000
                Re: neos Universal Compiler Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-19 17:42 +0000
            Re: neos Universal Compiler Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-19 15:43 +0000

csiph-web