Groups > alt.comp.software.firefox > #12722

Re: FF vs BR vs bad Internet

From	T <T@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups	alt.comp.software.firefox
Subject	Re: FF vs BR vs bad Internet
Date	2025-03-15 20:26 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<vr5ge0$7dqi$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<vr4jco$3ib7$1@dont-email.me> <vr58qs$mpuu$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/15/25 6:17 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 12:11:19 -0700, T wrote:
> 
>> Anyway, I put both Firefox (Gecko) and Brave Browser (Blink) on the
>> customer's machine.  Both browser had heart failure over the problem.
> 
> Nothing, really, is going to work in that situation. The underlying
> plumbing of your Internet connection is broken in a very fundamental way,
> and there’s nothing higher-level layers can do to fix it.

True.

I was just impressed at how each browser tolerated the
problem.  FF came out on top.

-T

Back to alt.comp.software.firefox | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

FF vs BR vs bad Internet T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-03-15 12:11 -0700
  Re: FF vs BR vs bad Internet Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2025-03-15 13:49 -0600
    Re: FF vs BR vs bad Internet T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-03-15 13:22 -0700
      Re: FF vs BR vs bad Internet John McCue <jmccue@qball.jmcunx.com> - 2025-03-16 14:01 +0000
  Re: FF vs BR vs bad Internet Paul in Houston TX <Paul@Houston.Texas> - 2025-03-15 16:33 -0500
  Re: FF vs BR vs bad Internet Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-16 01:17 +0000
    Re: FF vs BR vs bad Internet Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee> - 2025-03-16 03:45 +0100
    Re: FF vs BR vs bad Internet T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2025-03-15 20:26 -0700

csiph-web