Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #147077
| From | "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? |
| Date | 2025-03-07 14:58 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vqeu2i$3ilcc$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <m2tbqeF6l2mU4@mid.individual.net> <vqc0us$2v1pf$1@dont-email.me> <m2vnfjFhmqeU1@mid.individual.net> <vqec1d$3f0vr$1@dont-email.me> <m30b4vFkj1jU2@mid.individual.net> |
Arno, > But F-Droid has no proof who the person is, And you think that Google does ? Why ? > where they get the sources from. And you think that Google does ? Or even cares ? As I already mentioned, if I may take security firm reporting on Googles "walled garden", it has got quite a number of poisonned apps floating around. And than I won't even mention the ones that where good, but got sold lock-stock-and-barrel to nevarious players, which than created "updates" that are trojanned. So do yourself a favour, and do not think that an unbroken certificate chain meants all is on the up-and-up. It just means that nothing has changed in transport. I think this discussion has run its course. If you have nothing extra forward regarding the usage of app cerificates I think we can stop here. Regards, Rudy Wieser
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why does open source software include a "signing key"? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-02-26 21:36 +0000
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-02-26 21:44 +0000
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-02-26 22:36 +0000
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-02-28 08:43 +0100
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-02-28 19:30 +0000
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-02-28 19:46 +0000
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-02-28 21:42 +0100
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2025-02-28 09:01 +0100
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-02-28 19:19 +0000
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2025-03-01 10:00 +0100
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-03-01 09:54 +0000
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-03-01 10:12 +0000
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? Marion <marion@facts.com> - 2025-03-01 10:27 +0000
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-03-01 11:44 +0100
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-03-01 11:36 +0100
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2025-03-01 14:22 +0100
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-03-01 15:40 +0100
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2025-03-06 11:30 +0100
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-03-06 12:29 +0100
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2025-03-07 09:01 +0100
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-03-07 09:50 +0100
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2025-03-07 14:37 +0100
Re: Why does open source software include a "signing key"? "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid> - 2025-03-07 14:58 +0100
csiph-web