Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #182712

Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection"

From "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups alt.comp.os.windows-10
Subject Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection"
Date 2025-03-02 05:59 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <vq1o7k$pv5p$3@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <vpq6b3$36sd2$1@dont-email.me> <vpsd1o$3m2rg$1@dont-email.me> <vpsnpc$3o6go$1@dont-email.me> <op.22o7r8hn1svx94@office-pc.attlocal.net> <vptus9$2j6q$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 25/02/28 07:29 PM, Newyana2 wrote:
> On 2/28/2025 4:39 PM, Allan Higdon wrote:
> 
>>
>> If you're like me, an on-demand standalone AV scanner is enough.
>> One really good one is Emsisoft Emergency Kit.
>> https://www.emsisoft.com/en/home/emergency-kit/
>>
>> I've been using Hellzerg Optimizer to disable Windows Defender.
>> https://github.com/hellzerg/optimizer/#--how-to-disable-defender-in-windows-10-1903-and-later
>>
>> I disable Tamper Protection with a .Reg file.
>>
>> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows Defender\Features]
>> "TamperProtection"=dword:00000000
>>
>> You can use Winaero Tweaker to verify that Tamper Protection and
>> Windows Defender are disabled.
>> https://winaero.com/winaero-tweaker/
> 
>   Thanks. Good notes to check out. I have occasionally
> downloaded something like Clam to do a one-time check
> when I feel a bt of paranoia. I don't think I've ever tried
> Emsisoft.

I used to use Trendmicro's "Housecall" free online scanner a long time
ago. Still would probably work for somebody who doesn't mind knowingly
exposing their soft underbelly to a corporation.

-- 
John C.

Take back Microsoft from India.

Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-25 05:14 -0800
  Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-02-25 13:52 +0000
    Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2025-02-25 15:23 +0000
      Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-02-25 13:35 -0500
        Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" Ed Cryer <ed@somewhere.in.the.uk> - 2025-02-25 19:02 +0000
          Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-02-25 16:09 -0500
      Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2025-02-25 21:27 +0000
  Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-02-25 10:08 -0600
    Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-27 06:32 -0800
      Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" wasbit <wasbit@nowhere.com> - 2025-02-28 09:37 +0000
  Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-02-25 11:37 -0500
    Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-27 06:35 -0800
      Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-02-27 10:20 -0500
        Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-27 07:31 -0800
          Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-02-27 12:11 -0500
            Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-28 05:17 -0800
              Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-02-28 11:21 -0500
                Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" "Allan Higdon" <allanh@vivaldi.net> - 2025-02-28 15:39 -0600
                Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-02-28 22:29 -0500
                Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 05:59 -0800
                Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 05:55 -0800
              Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-02-28 11:55 -0600
                Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 06:03 -0800
                Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2025-03-03 00:46 +0000
                Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> - 2025-03-02 19:19 -0600
        Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2025-02-27 16:12 +0000
      Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-02-27 14:03 -0600
  Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ  <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 11:57 -0700
    Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-27 06:38 -0800
      Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ  <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-02-28 10:56 -0700
        Re: Dealing with Windows Security's "Ransomware protection" "John C." <r9jmg0@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-02 06:05 -0800

csiph-web