Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #193344
| From | Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Does bash have a tool ? |
| Date | 2018-03-05 04:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vpOPn-5pm-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <vpDKh-6pa-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vpEmZ-6Vm-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <vpEGm-72R-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <vpGoO-8gt-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <vpMDT-3KM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 03/04/2018 06:51 PM, David Wright wrote: > On Sun 04 Mar 2018 at 12:14:36 (-0600), John Hasler wrote: >> Richard Owlett writes: >>> I don't have any background in Perl and the last formal course in >>> programming was in the 60's. >> >> Perl is just bash, ed, sed, awk, grep, etc all smushed together into >> one. >> >>> However awk and/or sed may be what I'm looking for and are well >>> documented. >> >> It's exactly what those tools are for. Don't forget the rest of the >> toolkit. > > There's a case here for using specialist tools as we know we're > dealing with emails. > > I'd start by using a client like mutt to sort out which messages to > process. The easiest way of doing this is¹ to copy the outbox, open > the copy and sort the index by Subject. (o s in mutt.) > > Because Re: is normally ignored in mutt when sorting thus, type > :set reply_regexp="" > to temporarily defeat that. As a result, all the Re: messages now > sort together. > > On the first Re: in the list, press and hold down the <d> key to > mark them as deleted. $ will now purge them. Quit. > > Now I would run formail on the shrunken mailbox using the -s option > to run itself recursively, thus: > > $ formail -s formail -I "" < path/to/shrunken-mailbox > file-of-concatenated-bodies > > The first formail splits the mailbox and pipes each message to the > second one which strips the headers, pipes it back to the first which > pipes it into the output file. > > ¹the process may differ from client to client. > > Cheers, > David. > > IOW I should become educated IOW "I should think" I did not recognize appropriate direction
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Does bash have a tool ? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-03-04 16:30 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-03-04 17:10 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-03-04 17:30 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-03-04 18:10 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-03-04 20:10 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? Richard Hector <richard@walnut.gen.nz> - 2018-03-05 03:20 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-03-05 04:10 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-05 04:30 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-03-05 10:20 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-05 15:30 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-03-05 16:20 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-05 18:10 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-03-05 05:40 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? John Hasler <jhasler@newsguy.com> - 2018-03-04 19:20 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-03-05 02:00 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-03-05 04:20 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2018-03-05 06:50 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-03-05 10:10 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? Erik Christiansen <dvalin@internode.on.net> - 2018-03-05 11:20 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-03-04 18:30 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-03-05 11:30 +0100
A recomended guide to vim - was {Re: Does bash have a tool ?} Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-03-07 16:40 +0100
Re: A recomended guide to vim - was {Re: Does bash have a tool ?} Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-03-07 22:10 +0100
Re: A recomended guide to vim - was {Re: Does bash have a tool ?} Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-03-09 13:40 +0100
Re: A recomended guide to vim - was {Re: Does bash have a tool ?} Cousin Stanley <cousinstanley@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 14:20 +0100
An answer - was [Re: Does bash have a tool ?] Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-03-05 01:00 +0100
Re: An answer - was [Re: Does bash have a tool ?] Forest Dean Feighner <forest.feighner@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 02:00 +0100
Re: Does bash have a tool ? Gregory Seidman <gsslist+debian@anthropohedron.net> - 2018-03-05 22:50 +0100
csiph-web