Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #121680

Re: Why is Usenet dead?

From Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: Why is Usenet dead?
Date 2025-02-19 20:59 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <vp59m5$2d2mo$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <vp44i8$269qi$1@dont-email.me> <vp4tc0$2am2r$1@dont-email.me> <vp4u6v$2aqea$1@dont-email.me> <vp4v3o$2b3nh$1@dont-email.me> <20250219191518.000016c6@yahoo.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 19.02.2025 19:15, Michael S wrote:
> 
> Reimplementing double-linked list is fine if all you need is
> double-linked list. It does not take more than 20 minutes and typically
> you end up with code that fits requirements better than when you
> take it from somebody else.

Too bad that std::list is the most useless of containers. std::deque has 
always been a better fit in my use cases, but it is not so trivially 
implementable. And the upcoming C++26 std::hive would probably be yet 
better for some similar use cases.

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why is Usenet dead? Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-16 10:47 +0000
  Re: Why is Usenet dead? ImperiusDamian <dgwrightauthor@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 23:59 -0500
  Re: Why is Usenet dead? Stuart Redmann <DerTopper@web.de> - 2025-02-17 22:34 +0100
    Re: Why is Usenet dead? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-18 08:22 +0000
      Re: Why is Usenet dead? Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-02-18 14:21 -0500
        Re: Why is Usenet dead? Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-18 20:23 +0000
        Re: Why is Usenet dead? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-19 08:25 +0000
          Re: Why is Usenet dead? Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-02-19 10:29 -0500
            Re: Why is Usenet dead? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-19 15:41 +0000
            Re: Why is Usenet dead? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-19 16:43 +0100
              Re: Why is Usenet dead? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-19 15:58 +0000
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-19 19:15 +0200
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-19 18:14 +0000
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-02-19 18:20 +0000
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2025-02-19 20:59 +0200
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-20 08:51 +0000
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-20 17:39 +0000
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2025-02-20 22:39 +0200
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-21 10:24 +0000
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-21 12:13 +0000
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-21 12:25 +0000
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-21 10:23 +0000
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-21 12:12 +0000

csiph-web