Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #121665

Re: Why is Usenet dead?

From Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: Why is Usenet dead?
Date 2025-02-18 08:22 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <vp1g0s$1k8bv$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <meg3rjphmqj5k1bd3lnolgcl5upsb14ejp@4ax.com> <1140530530.761520238.270676.DerTopper-web.de@news.eternal-september.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 22:34:48 +0100
Stuart Redmann <DerTopper@web.de> wibbled:
>but it is easy to ignore. The fact that only few discussions are active at
>the moment could either indicate that (a) C++ has developed in such a
>favorable direction in recent years that there is little to complain about,
>or (b) C++ is less and less popular. I‘m thinking it’s (b), but I wished it
>
>were (a).

Yes, I think unfortunately that the intersect between Python and C++ has
become much larger in recent years and some projects that would have been done 
in C++ (or Java) are now done in Python because modern hardware means its now
fast enough despite being horribly inefficient and because of the miriad
libraries that allow lego brick plug and play style programming.

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Why is Usenet dead? Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-16 10:47 +0000
  Re: Why is Usenet dead? ImperiusDamian <dgwrightauthor@gmail.com> - 2025-02-16 23:59 -0500
  Re: Why is Usenet dead? Stuart Redmann <DerTopper@web.de> - 2025-02-17 22:34 +0100
    Re: Why is Usenet dead? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-18 08:22 +0000
      Re: Why is Usenet dead? Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-02-18 14:21 -0500
        Re: Why is Usenet dead? Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-18 20:23 +0000
        Re: Why is Usenet dead? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-19 08:25 +0000
          Re: Why is Usenet dead? Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-02-19 10:29 -0500
            Re: Why is Usenet dead? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-19 15:41 +0000
            Re: Why is Usenet dead? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-19 16:43 +0100
              Re: Why is Usenet dead? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-19 15:58 +0000
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-19 19:15 +0200
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-19 18:14 +0000
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-02-19 18:20 +0000
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2025-02-19 20:59 +0200
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-20 08:51 +0000
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-20 17:39 +0000
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2025-02-20 22:39 +0200
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-21 10:24 +0000
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-21 12:13 +0000
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-21 12:25 +0000
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-21 10:23 +0000
                Re: Why is Usenet dead? Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-21 12:12 +0000

csiph-web