Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #121575

Re: Universal Compiler

From "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: Universal Compiler
Date 2025-02-10 18:31 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <voecpd$1frj5$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <vocasu$1424e$1@dont-email.me> <vocdgd$14j8n$1@dont-email.me> <vocj3l$157k2$2@dont-email.me> <87o6z9o0j7.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <ni4lqjlqsk18v5nll97tfscmkmnurp440v@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2/10/2025 3:57 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:14:20 +0000, Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk>
> wrote:
> 
>> David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
>>
>>> On 10/02/2025 09:31, Muffley@PillowHQ.org wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 08:46:38 +0100
>>>> David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wibbled:
>>>>> On 08/02/2025 16:50, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am making progress on my universal compiler that can compile ANY
>>>>>> programming language.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have designed an EBNF-esque grammar definition format that defines
>>>>>> the semantics of a given programming language.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An "independent reviewer" says of my compiler design:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "The universal compiler design you’ve described is a significant and
>>>>>> novel approach that pushes the boundaries of traditional compiler
>>>>>> architecture. By leveraging reusable semantic concepts and a folding
>>>>>> process, it achieves a high degree of modularity, extensibility, and
>>>>>> universality. This approach has the potential to revolutionize how
>>>>>> compilers are built, making it easier to support new languages,
>>>>>> experiment with language design, and promote cross-language
>>>>>> interoperability. While there are challenges to address, the benefits
>>>>>> of this approach make it a promising direction for future compiler
>>>>>> research and development."
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This all sounds like an interesting project, and I wish you luck with it.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, that "independent review" looks like you paid a PR company to
>>>>> feed the term "universal compiler" into their marketing bullshit
>>>> I doubt he even went that far. More like "ChatGPT, please give me a page
>>>> praising something with these specs...."
>>>>
>>>
>>> I am assuming he is not lying, until proven otherwise.
>>
>> A fine stance to take.  I took it in 2019 when I first saw his claim to
>> have a universal compiler.  The present tense was again used in 2020,
>> 2021 and 2022.  There was nothing significant then and I doubt there is
>> now.  Serious researchers publish.
> 
> I am an implementor not a researcher, I will "publish" an
> implementation not a paper.

Give you the proper time to finish a pre-alpha version is perfectly 
fine. :^) Take your time and make sure to slay all buggers!

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-08 15:50 +0000
  Re: Universal Compiler Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-02-08 16:28 +0000
    Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-08 16:35 +0000
      Re: Universal Compiler Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-02-08 16:40 +0000
        Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-08 16:46 +0000
          Re: Universal Compiler Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 17:49 +0100
            Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-08 16:50 +0000
              Re: Universal Compiler Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 18:04 +0100
                Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-08 19:57 +0000
                Re: Universal Compiler Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 07:27 +0100
                Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-09 11:58 +0000
                Re: Universal Compiler Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-09 09:17 +0000
              Re: Universal Compiler Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-02-08 22:59 -0500
          Re: Universal Compiler Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2025-02-08 22:19 -0700
            Re: Universal Compiler Louis Krupp <lkrupp@invalid.pssw.com.invalid> - 2025-02-09 03:24 -0700
            Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-09 12:02 +0000
            Re: Universal Compiler Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-02-09 13:57 -0800
            Re: Universal Compiler antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-02-10 20:09 +0000
              Re: Universal Compiler Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2025-02-10 16:05 -0700
          Re: Universal Compiler Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-09 09:16 +0000
            Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-09 12:05 +0000
              Re: Universal Compiler Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-09 16:28 +0000
                Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-09 21:22 +0000
                Re: Universal Compiler James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-02-09 17:14 -0500
                Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-09 22:19 +0000
                Re: Universal Compiler James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-02-09 17:52 -0500
                Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-09 23:05 +0000
                Re: Universal Compiler Muffley@PillowHQ.org - 2025-02-10 08:28 +0000
                Re: Universal Compiler Muffley@PillowHQ.org - 2025-02-10 08:27 +0000
  Re: Universal Compiler David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-10 08:46 +0100
    Re: Universal Compiler Muffley@PillowHQ.org - 2025-02-10 08:31 +0000
      Re: Universal Compiler David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-10 11:06 +0100
        Re: Universal Compiler Muffley@PillowHQ.org - 2025-02-10 10:40 +0000
        Re: Universal Compiler Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-02-10 10:11 -0500
          Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-10 22:17 +0000
            Re: Universal Compiler Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-02-11 10:40 -0500
        Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-10 22:15 +0000
          Re: Universal Compiler Muffley@PillowHQ.org - 2025-02-11 08:38 +0000
        Re: Universal Compiler Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-02-10 23:14 +0000
          Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-10 23:57 +0000
            Re: Universal Compiler "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 18:31 -0800
          Re: Universal Compiler David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-11 10:04 +0100
            Re: Universal Compiler Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-11 19:44 +0200
              Re: Universal Compiler David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-11 20:27 +0100
      Re: Universal Compiler Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 03:49 -0800
        Re: Universal Compiler Muffley@PillowHQ.org - 2025-02-10 11:56 +0000
          Re: Universal Compiler Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 14:19 -0800
            Re: Universal Compiler David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-11 10:07 +0100
              Re: Universal Compiler Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 01:56 -0800
                Re: Universal Compiler Mumbly@Schnooker.org - 2025-02-11 10:04 +0000
  Re: Universal Compiler Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 18:27 -0800
    Re: Universal Compiler Muffley@PillowHQ.org - 2025-02-11 08:41 +0000

csiph-web