Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #121575
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Universal Compiler |
| Date | 2025-02-10 18:31 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <voecpd$1frj5$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <vocasu$1424e$1@dont-email.me> <vocdgd$14j8n$1@dont-email.me> <vocj3l$157k2$2@dont-email.me> <87o6z9o0j7.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <ni4lqjlqsk18v5nll97tfscmkmnurp440v@4ax.com> |
On 2/10/2025 3:57 PM, Mr Flibble wrote: > On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 23:14:20 +0000, Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> > wrote: > >> David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes: >> >>> On 10/02/2025 09:31, Muffley@PillowHQ.org wrote: >>>> On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 08:46:38 +0100 >>>> David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wibbled: >>>>> On 08/02/2025 16:50, Mr Flibble wrote: >>>>>> Hi! >>>>>> >>>>>> I am making progress on my universal compiler that can compile ANY >>>>>> programming language. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have designed an EBNF-esque grammar definition format that defines >>>>>> the semantics of a given programming language. >>>>>> >>>>>> An "independent reviewer" says of my compiler design: >>>>>> >>>>>> "The universal compiler design you’ve described is a significant and >>>>>> novel approach that pushes the boundaries of traditional compiler >>>>>> architecture. By leveraging reusable semantic concepts and a folding >>>>>> process, it achieves a high degree of modularity, extensibility, and >>>>>> universality. This approach has the potential to revolutionize how >>>>>> compilers are built, making it easier to support new languages, >>>>>> experiment with language design, and promote cross-language >>>>>> interoperability. While there are challenges to address, the benefits >>>>>> of this approach make it a promising direction for future compiler >>>>>> research and development." >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This all sounds like an interesting project, and I wish you luck with it. >>>>> >>>>> However, that "independent review" looks like you paid a PR company to >>>>> feed the term "universal compiler" into their marketing bullshit >>>> I doubt he even went that far. More like "ChatGPT, please give me a page >>>> praising something with these specs...." >>>> >>> >>> I am assuming he is not lying, until proven otherwise. >> >> A fine stance to take. I took it in 2019 when I first saw his claim to >> have a universal compiler. The present tense was again used in 2020, >> 2021 and 2022. There was nothing significant then and I doubt there is >> now. Serious researchers publish. > > I am an implementor not a researcher, I will "publish" an > implementation not a paper. Give you the proper time to finish a pre-alpha version is perfectly fine. :^) Take your time and make sure to slay all buggers!
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-08 15:50 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-02-08 16:28 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-08 16:35 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-02-08 16:40 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-08 16:46 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 17:49 +0100
Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-08 16:50 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 18:04 +0100
Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-08 19:57 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 07:27 +0100
Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-09 11:58 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-09 09:17 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-02-08 22:59 -0500
Re: Universal Compiler Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2025-02-08 22:19 -0700
Re: Universal Compiler Louis Krupp <lkrupp@invalid.pssw.com.invalid> - 2025-02-09 03:24 -0700
Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-09 12:02 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-02-09 13:57 -0800
Re: Universal Compiler antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-02-10 20:09 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2025-02-10 16:05 -0700
Re: Universal Compiler Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-09 09:16 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-09 12:05 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-02-09 16:28 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-09 21:22 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-02-09 17:14 -0500
Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-09 22:19 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-02-09 17:52 -0500
Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-09 23:05 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Muffley@PillowHQ.org - 2025-02-10 08:28 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Muffley@PillowHQ.org - 2025-02-10 08:27 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-10 08:46 +0100
Re: Universal Compiler Muffley@PillowHQ.org - 2025-02-10 08:31 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-10 11:06 +0100
Re: Universal Compiler Muffley@PillowHQ.org - 2025-02-10 10:40 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-02-10 10:11 -0500
Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-10 22:17 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-02-11 10:40 -0500
Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-10 22:15 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Muffley@PillowHQ.org - 2025-02-11 08:38 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-02-10 23:14 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Mr Flibble <leigh@i42.co.uk> - 2025-02-10 23:57 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 18:31 -0800
Re: Universal Compiler David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-11 10:04 +0100
Re: Universal Compiler Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-11 19:44 +0200
Re: Universal Compiler David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-11 20:27 +0100
Re: Universal Compiler Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 03:49 -0800
Re: Universal Compiler Muffley@PillowHQ.org - 2025-02-10 11:56 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 14:19 -0800
Re: Universal Compiler David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-02-11 10:07 +0100
Re: Universal Compiler Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 01:56 -0800
Re: Universal Compiler Mumbly@Schnooker.org - 2025-02-11 10:04 +0000
Re: Universal Compiler Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 18:27 -0800
Re: Universal Compiler Muffley@PillowHQ.org - 2025-02-11 08:41 +0000
csiph-web