Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.laptops.thinkpad > #584
| From | bp@www.zefox.net |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.laptops.thinkpad |
| Subject | Re: Dead battery after storage on T400s |
| Date | 2025-02-09 01:44 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vo919i$a5iv$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <vmcm67$3tept$1@dont-email.me> <vo5li8$3kbd1$1@dont-email.me> <67a67fd1@news.ausics.net> <vo8f2g$6mtr$1@dont-email.me> <67a7eeb0@news.ausics.net> |
Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote: > bp@www.zefox.net wrote: >> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote: >>> A difference in run time like that makes no sense to me unless >>> you were working it hard or had power-hungry devices plugged into >>> it during the first test. I guess Windows could also have been >>> doing an upgrade in the background before, if you didn't disable >>> that during the test (or, since it's Windows, if it ignored you and >>> did something anyway). >> >> After I got the new battery and started exercising it per the seller's >> directions (which did seem to improve the performance) I gradually >> learned about low power settings. When the new battery clocked in at >> only 4.5 hours at low power settings, I got curious and re-tested the >> old battery with the new settings. Lo and behold, they were similar. >> The new battery is better, but for ~100$ not by much. > > You are actually timing how long until it automatically shuts down > due to running out of charge, not just going from the estimated > time remaining, right? Those estimations aren't reliable with old > batteries. > I tried to keep track of time to self-power-off. The machine was idle, in the sense that I wasn't actively using it except to check when I should take another look. WiFi was on, screen blanking was automatic on a short (few minutes) interval. >> I'm left wondering: >> 1. could a fifteen your old battery still have 80% capacity? > > Discharge/recharge cycles are quoted as the key factor for battery > aging, so it might fit if the battery was never used much. > I have no information on how much the machine was used. It's in very nice condition but that's more likely due to a fatidious owner than lack of use. Most batteries are said to have a calendar life along with a cycle life, so I figured calendar would be the limiting factor. Maybe not. >> 2. should a new 4400 mAh battery last more than 4.5 hours? > > Was the screen on/off for both the old "little over one hour" test > and the new tests? I don't know what's normal for a T400s, but > details like that and whether you were using it or just letting it > sit would be important for getting a real answer. The "little over an hour" tests were done when I didn't know about the power control settings. Those obviously mattered hugely. The screen blanking was left as it was for the initial tests. I think 5 minutes after keyboard/mouse activity, maybe 10. So, how often I checked made some difference but I tried to be consistent. At one point I found a review claiming 2 hours and change playing a DVD but could find no dvd-playing program in the default Win10 system. Would playing a DVD be a more reproducible test? In practice, what I have is what I got 8-) It works well enough for my purposes, but it would be nice to find a reliable test of the battery condition. To my surprise the T400S Hardware Maintenance Manual seems mute on run times. I was hoping there's some piece of software that writes battery output energy to disk under some consistent loading benchmark. Guess not. Thanks for writing, bob prohaska
Back to comp.sys.laptops.thinkpad | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Dead battery after storage on T400s bp@www.zefox.net - 2025-01-14 01:50 +0000
Re: Dead battery after storage on T400s bp@www.zefox.net - 2025-01-14 18:11 +0000
Re: Dead battery after storage on T400s not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-15 06:40 +1000
Re: Dead battery after storage on T400s bp@www.zefox.net - 2025-01-15 17:25 +0000
Re: Dead battery after storage on T400s Adrian Caspersz <email@here.invalid> - 2025-01-15 21:02 +0000
Re: Dead battery after storage on T400s bp@www.zefox.net - 2025-01-15 22:03 +0000
Re: Dead battery after storage on T400s not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-01-16 07:44 +1000
Re: Dead battery after storage on T400s bp@www.zefox.net - 2025-01-15 22:45 +0000
Re: Dead battery after storage on T400s Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2025-01-16 13:47 +1000
Re: Dead battery after storage on T400s bp@www.zefox.net - 2025-01-16 16:10 +0000
Re: Dead battery after storage on T400s Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2025-01-17 12:53 +1000
Re: Dead battery after storage on T400s bp@www.zefox.net - 2025-01-17 04:26 +0000
Re: Dead battery after storage on T400s bp@www.zefox.net - 2025-02-07 19:05 +0000
Re: Dead battery after storage on T400s not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-08 07:49 +1000
Re: Dead battery after storage on T400s bp@www.zefox.net - 2025-02-08 20:33 +0000
Re: Dead battery after storage on T400s not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-09 09:54 +1000
Re: Dead battery after storage on T400s bp@www.zefox.net - 2025-02-09 01:44 +0000
csiph-web