Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #684743

Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-)

From	Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-)
Date	2025-01-30 00:52 -0600
Organization	individual
Message-ID	<vnf7jv$2r3dk$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <vndfso$2dpkm$2@dont-email.me> <vndm9g$2f2s9$1@dont-email.me> <vnds9u$2gd8l$1@dont-email.me> <vne2i6$2hkua$1@dont-email.me> <vnerh3$2lpl7$2@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 1/29/25 9:26 PM, -hh wrote:
> On 1/29/25 3:20 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>> On 1/29/25 12:33 PM, -hh wrote:
>>> On 1/29/25 11:50 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Works great. This $12 one with lubuntu will be my back up computer.
>>>
>>> If it does what you need it to do, great.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Eat your hearts out hh :) Spend a couple of more thousands on yours. 
>>>> Hehe :)
>>>
>>> Nah, I'm not jealous of your frugality.  Indeed, if I had a need for 
>>> a minimally capable PC, I have a couple of them sitting around that I 
>>> could put back into service...plus I wouldn't have sold one last 
>>> month for more than 10x your bargain find.
>>>
>>>
>>>> And rest of you, place "Christmas lights" inside them. Gift wrap 
>>>> your computers.
>>>>
>>>> Hahhahhahhahh :-))
>>>>
>>>> You Bozos will get more out of them that way.
>>>
>>> Which still comes back to the question of if one's capability needs 
>>> are being satisfied or not, such as you and your $12 Special:  it 
>>> seems that being able to post texts to USENET is met, but is there 
>>> anything else that its needed for which is more demanding?  If not, 
>>> great:  you're all set.
>>>
>>>
>>> -hh
>>
>>
>> The $12 Special goes well with lubuntu, and the package blends nicely 
>> in Usenet ...
> 
> Figured as much.  One of my old PCs that's being kept as a 'maybe 
> project' is IIRC an old Celeron running MS-Vista that has a small SSD 
> for its boot drive which could make for a Linux boxen for something. I'd 
> be thinking more 'file server' though, although I'd have to check to see 
> if it is even new enough to be SATA, and if so, how many bays it has to 
> stuff with old small hard drives to waste some electricity on.
> 
> I've not gotten to it because I already have two Linux boxens doing 
> that, so do I really need a third one?
> 
> 
> -hh


I do. I've had two occasions just last year when I needed to do 
something with a working computer and printer and for some reason none 
of the 5 computers I thought were working could help me.

I don't know about you, but I never quite know a computer set up is 
there when I need it.

Also I don't know how many pets you have. I have enough to ruin any of 
my electronic devices years before their time would be up.

Thread

Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 16:14 -0600
  Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 18:21 -0600
    Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-29 07:10 -0600
      Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 08:48 -0600
    Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-29 09:59 -0500
      Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-29 15:25 +0000
        Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-29 11:42 -0500
        Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-29 11:53 -0500
    Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 09:01 -0600
      Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-29 10:18 -0500
      Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 10:50 -0600
        Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-29 13:33 -0500
          Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 14:20 -0600
            Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-29 22:26 -0500
              Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-30 00:52 -0600
                Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-30 10:48 -0500
                Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-30 13:17 -0600
                Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-30 16:14 -0600
                Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-30 19:46 -0500
                Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-30 19:38 -0600
                Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-30 19:19 -0600
                Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-30 23:06 -0500
            Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-29 22:51 -0500
              Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-30 08:44 -0500
  Re: Relf: The Fate of My Optiplex 7050 Issue :-) DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-29 11:45 -0500

csiph-web