Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #181715
| From | "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10 |
| Subject | Re: New reason for Disk Management ("Shrink") not working |
| Date | 2025-01-25 10:55 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vn31hd$2snf7$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <vn30ds$2sg61$1@dont-email.me> |
On 1/25/25 10:36 AM, Paul wrote: > I was experimenting with a hard drive the other day, > a 4TB one, and making the C: drive really large. > This was to counter a complaint from some software > "insufficient space to..." type error. > > So anyway, I could see a green stripe of material about > half way out on the disk. I figured, no problem, > if I want to shrink the disk, that material will move > out of the way for me. > > It didn't. > > I got an error, that said the material could not be moved, > and it was different than the usual material problem. It was > traceable to $BADCLUS, a cluster marked off by the file > system driver. Apparently, the SMART log reported a > series of "UDMA CRC errors". These are errors on the > packets on the SATA cable, causing the packets to be > retransmitted. That's not a conventional data CRC as such. > Yet, the software decided that this constituted a bad cluster, > so the area on the disk was marked off. > > There is a option in CHKDSK, to verify bad clusters, but this > in fact, scans the entire partition again, as if doing a /r . > > This would check for errors, and bad clusters. > > chkdsk /f /r C: # Fix structural errors, read-scan all clusters to verify they are working > # Mark off new bad clusters. Do not verify any existing bad clusters. > > chkdsk /b C: # This seemingly does the same thing, but can turn bad clusters into good clusters. > # If a cluster was "flagged by mistake", this can undo it. > > On a large disk, this can take hours to complete (either command). > > When the /b run completed, it reported > > "Removing 1 clusters from the Bad Clusters File." > > and that is what I was hoping would happen on the /b run. > > I went back to Disk Management, and I still could not shrink the volume. > It was still reporting there was a problem with the same issue as > previously. > > On a hunch, I booted a Windows 7 disk, cabled up the affected drive, > and did a regular CHKDSK on the partition in question. I know at this > point, there is nothing wrong with any clusters, so there is no need to > do an hours-long scan yet again. > > chkdsk /f K: # Windows 7 CHKDSK (of the second disk drive affected partition) > > and finally, after this, the Shrink menu started working again in > Disk Management. Presumably this is related to Windows 7 > correcting $BITMAP-type issues. (W10/W11 don't handle $BITMAP > properly on partitions any more, leaving data at rest in an > indeterminate state.) Windows 7 cares about the $BITMAP, and > fixed it up for me. > > Disk is now back to normal again. The shrink completed (2TB partition down > to 200GB) with no trouble at all. When a partition starts small, you make > it huge, then there won't be a problem to make it as small as it was at first. > Except if there is a bad cluster in there (a cluster flagged as bad > while the file system was running). > _________________________________________________ > / \ 4096 byte > X 512 512 512 512 512 512 512 512 X cluster on > \ XXX / OS C: partition > ------------------------------------------------ > > If any sector is bad, the cluster is marked bad. > The "cluster" is a unit of storage in NTFS. > > Paul > More reason to keep a spare Win7 machine /disk around huh. -- Linux Mint 22.1, Cinnamon 6.4.6, Kernel 6.8.0-51-generic Thunderbird 128.6.0esr, Mozilla Firefox 134.0.2 Alan K.
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
New reason for Disk Management ("Shrink") not working Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-25 10:36 -0500
Re: New reason for Disk Management ("Shrink") not working "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-01-25 10:55 -0500
Re: New reason for Disk Management ("Shrink") not working Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-25 11:20 -0500
Re: New reason for Disk Management ("Shrink") not working Jim <noreply@ghyhgtgfrde.com> - 2025-01-26 02:06 +0000
Re: New reason for Disk Management ("Shrink") not working "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-26 03:29 +0100
Re: New reason for Disk Management ("Shrink") not working Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-25 23:14 -0500
Re: New reason for Disk Management ("Shrink") not working "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-26 03:31 +0100
Re: New reason for Disk Management ("Shrink") not working Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-25 22:06 -0500
Re: New reason for Disk Management ("Shrink") not working "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-26 13:54 +0100
csiph-web