Re: We have a new standard!

From	David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c++
Subject	Re: We have a new standard!
Date	2024-12-30 15:52 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<vkuc2i$1lt2f$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <vkrk4l$10d4e$1@dont-email.me> <vkshgh$1799g$1@dont-email.me> <20241230004450.0000202d@yahoo.com> <86seq5bete.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vku21r$1kbjn$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 30/12/2024 13:00, boltar@caprica.org wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 03:17:17 -0800
> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wibbled:
>> Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 00:12:31 +0200
>>> Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 29.12.2024 15:51, David Brown wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You can have an informed opinion about C++, and agree or disagree
>>>>> with the opinions of the committee members.
>>>>>
>>>>> But what you don't get to do - or at least, don't get to do if you
>>>>> want to be viewed seriously - is spout an /uninformed/ opinion.
>>>>> That's no more than mindless prejudice, and of no interest to
>>>>> anyone.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks David, for standing against the trolls.  It's a pity that
>>>> personal freedoms are often interpreted as "my ignorant opinion has
>>>> exactly the same worth as your expert knowledge".
>>>>
>>>> I'm all for personal freedoms, but my freedoms end where they might
>>>> hurt other people, or the nature for that matter.  Boasting ignorant
>>>> jumble can easily do that.
>>>
>>> It seems that Muttley@dastardlyhq.com still didn't figure out why
>>> stating strong opinion about something that you not just didn't learn
>>> in depth, but didn't even look at casually is less than optimal.
>>
>> For some time now I have simply stopped reading his comments.
>> I don't know why anyone bothers with him for more than a handful
>> of interactions.
> 
> The same could be said about you.
> 

There are plenty of people here who have stopped reading posts by 
particular other people - or at least, specifically stopped reply to 
them.  I think the group would be poorer if everyone refused to respond 
to someone they judge to be trolling, rude, or otherwise unpleasant in 
some way.  Sometimes the replies might be of interest or use to others 
(I don't expect Muttley to stop giving uninformed opinions, but it is 
conceivable that some other posters will at least look at what's new in 
C++23 before telling us all how terrible it is).  And of course 
sometimes even the worst trolls make good points or raise interesting 
questions.

Tim never replies to my posts directly - though he occasionally 
indirectly shows signs of reading them.  I believe I have at least some 
understanding of his reasons for ignoring me.  (I am not a model poster 
by any means.)  But I'd prefer it if he did as many others here try to 
do - reply to posts, not to posters.

Thread

Re: We have a new standard! Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-12-27 21:51 -0500
  Re: We have a new standard! "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 20:11 -0800
  Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-12-28 10:19 +0000
    Re: We have a new standard! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-12-28 16:20 +0100
      Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-12-29 09:32 +0000
        Re: We have a new standard! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-12-29 14:51 +0100
          Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-12-29 16:16 +0000
            Re: We have a new standard! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-12-30 08:34 +0100
              Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-12-30 09:34 +0000
                Re: We have a new standard! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-12-30 15:37 +0100
                Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2024-12-30 15:08 +0000
                Re: We have a new standard! James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-12-30 18:06 -0500
                Re: We have a new standard! Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-01 17:55 +0200
                Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-01-01 16:05 +0000
          Re: We have a new standard! Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2024-12-30 00:12 +0200
            Re: We have a new standard! Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-30 00:44 +0200
              Re: We have a new standard! Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-12-30 03:17 -0800
                Re: We have a new standard! boltar@caprica.org - 2024-12-30 12:00 +0000
                Re: We have a new standard! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-12-30 15:52 +0100
                Re: We have a new standard! Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-12-30 18:06 -0800
              Re: We have a new standard! Pavel <pauldontspamtolk@removeyourself.dontspam.yahoo> - 2024-12-30 22:26 -0500
            Re: We have a new standard! Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-12-30 03:14 -0800
              Re: We have a new standard! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-12-30 16:05 +0100
              Re: We have a new standard! "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 16:02 -0800
                Re: We have a new standard! Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-12-30 17:58 -0800
                Re: We have a new standard! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-12-31 10:54 +0100
                Re: We have a new standard! "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 13:40 -0800
          Re: We have a new standard! Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-30 13:25 +0200
            Re: We have a new standard! David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-12-30 17:15 +0100
              Re: We have a new standard! Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-04 21:40 +0200
    Re: We have a new standard! Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2024-12-28 13:05 -0500
      Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-12-29 09:43 +0000
        Re: We have a new standard! Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-12-29 08:50 -0500
          Re: We have a new standard! wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 22:33 +0800
            Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-12-29 16:17 +0000
              Re: We have a new standard! wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 01:08 +0800
                Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-12-29 17:11 +0000
          Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-12-29 16:15 +0000
            Re: We have a new standard! Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-12-29 11:57 -0500
              Re: We have a new standard! Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2024-12-29 17:08 +0000
              Re: We have a new standard! Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-12-29 19:50 +0200

csiph-web