Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-11 > #15731
| From | Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-11 |
| Subject | Re: Virtual Desktop? |
| Date | 2024-12-29 12:58 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vks2is$13r1g$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <vkrgs1$uvra$1@dont-email.me> <vkridl$106ij$1@dont-email.me> <vkrk7p$uvra$2@dont-email.me> |
On 12/29/2024 8:52 AM, T wrote:
> On 12/29/24 05:22, Newyana2 wrote:
>> Maybe this is a dumb question, but why not just use the program
>> at "normal" size and hand-size it. Most programs will remember
>> that setting when they open. My monitor is 27"/1920x1080. There
>> are few programs that I use at fullscreen.
>
> It does not matter what size you make the Approach
> program. If the screen's resolution is above 1920x 1440
> Approach gets weird. Things don't paint. screens shimmer.
> Tool bar don't show, but are there if you guess where
> to click. etc..
>
How strange. It clearly doesn't exceed any normal numeric limit.
I wonder what the problem could be. The program should be
tracking it's own RECT. The only thing I can think of is a
signed 16-bit integer tracking twips instead of pixels, causing
the values to come back as negative values at some point when
you get past about 2100 pixels. But even that limit shouldn't apply
if the window is small enough and in the center.
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-11 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Virtual Desktop? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 04:55 -0800
Re: Virtual Desktop? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-29 13:10 +0000
Re: Virtual Desktop? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 05:55 -0800
Re: Virtual Desktop? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 05:58 -0800
Re: Virtual Desktop? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-12-29 14:09 +0000
Re: Virtual Desktop? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 06:27 -0800
Re: Virtual Desktop? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2024-12-29 10:38 -0500
Re: Virtual Desktop? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 23:52 -0800
Re: Virtual Desktop? Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2024-12-29 08:22 -0500
Re: Virtual Desktop? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 05:52 -0800
Re: Virtual Desktop? Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2024-12-29 12:58 -0500
Re: Virtual Desktop? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 23:54 -0800
Re: Virtual Desktop? Graham J <nobody@nowhere.co.uk> - 2024-12-29 13:29 +0000
Re: Virtual Desktop? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 05:56 -0800
Re: Virtual Desktop? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-12-30 04:09 -0500
Re: Virtual Desktop? Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 08:25 +0000
Re: Virtual Desktop? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-12-30 05:33 -0500
Re: Virtual Desktop? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2024-12-29 23:16 -0600
Re: Virtual Desktop? T <T@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 00:01 -0800
csiph-web