Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #681051
| From | Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.comp.os.windows-11 |
| Subject | Re: Windows 11 for Workstations vs. Linux Mint |
| Date | 2024-12-22 04:08 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vk8kuk$i57i$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <lsn2fhFgli2U1@mid.individual.net> <vk6j4q$2e70$2@dont-email.me> <lsouflFrc8fU1@mid.individual.net> <vk7rkb$ag8f$1@dont-email.me> <vk822m$f8j7$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Sat, 12/21/2024 10:46 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 20:56:27 -0500, Paul wrote: > >> NTFS then, is now just about perfect ... > > Still does a poor job of handling lots of small files, though. > First and foremost, we want file systems that don't lose any of our goods. The file systems we have now, are more robust than they used to be, and this is a start. The file system is scanned in the background, details are not provided as to how this works, merely that latent faults are not an issue as they used to be. I don't live on a diet of synthetic tests. Synthetic tests are fun, but that's for characterization and telling people the best way to use the file systems. The file system is good enough for casual home user usage. I would not bill something like NTFS as a hyperscaler product. I can tell you from my testing, not to put four billion files in a single flat directory. The transfer would never finish. Balanced trees of files work better, and you might be able to handle 4x the files that way. I would also not attempt to put four billion files in a balanced tree. When the Wiki article on NTFS says the file system has a theoretical limit of four billion files, I doubt anyone has finished the test of that statement. It is quite common in file systems, to over-promise, and discover by exhaustive testing, the limit of the file system is not actually as stated on the tin. Apple for example, had two incidents, where they released a TN stating a capability, and then three months later, had to retract and rewrite a few of the TN details to suit. The OS has enough issues with things like File Explorer, to discourage running a giant lemonade stand off the OS. It's not nearly good enough for that. The Federated Search has a recommended max size of one million files. I have 1.2 million files on my collection, and the federated search works OK on that. The reason for the recommended size, is it takes a whole day to index a file collection that big. And it slows down the larger the collection. As you would expect with the generation of inverted indexes. When I do synthetic tests here, I do them on a RAM drive, not for speed (nothing has "speed" here), that's just to avoid shaking the disk drive to shit. The fastest way to transfer files off a Windows disk, is at cluster level with a backup product. I can transfer 40 million files from one storage device to another in ten minutes, if working at the cluster level. Then enjoy random accessing them through the file system again, once the files are on the new device. For performance reasons, I would never recommend cp -R src dest as the "right way" for every job. Transferring 40 million files with a cp -R, that's going to take more than a day to do. and that's why we experiment with the odd synthetic case, to see what the best method is. Paul
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Windows 11 for Workstations vs. Linux Mint vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-21 05:36 +0000
Re: Windows 11 for Workstations vs. Linux Mint Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-21 07:07 +0000
Re: Windows 11 for Workstations vs. Linux Mint Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-21 07:54 -0500
Re: Windows 11 for Workstations vs. Linux Mint CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-21 08:45 -0500
Re: Windows 11 for Workstations vs. Linux Mint vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-21 23:27 +0000
Re: Windows 11 for Workstations vs. Linux Mint -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-21 09:25 -0500
Re: Windows 11 for Workstations vs. Linux Mint Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-21 21:05 +0000
Re: Windows 11 for Workstations vs. Linux Mint vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-21 22:40 +0000
Re: Windows 11 for Workstations vs. Linux Mint Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-12-21 20:56 -0500
Re: Windows 11 for Workstations vs. Linux Mint Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-22 03:46 +0000
Re: Windows 11 for Workstations vs. Linux Mint Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-12-22 04:08 -0500
Re: Windows 11 for Workstations vs. Linux Mint Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-22 20:32 +0000
Re: Windows 11 for Workstations vs. Linux Mint Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-12-22 17:42 -0500
csiph-web