Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > talk.politics.misc > #1167068

Re: "40", or... 4? (Re: At Least 40 Killed

From hello there <no-spam-thank-you@not.home>
Newsgroups talk.politics.misc, soc.culture.israel, alt.support.schizophrenia, talk.politics.guns, alt.politics.elections
Subject Re: "40", or... 4? (Re: At Least 40 Killed
Date 2024-11-22 09:13 +0000
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID <vhpi0b$3b9$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References <vh9bn9$pf6$3@pcls7.std.com> <sBOiugbtclovhGuPYATJAnEihqCArILZ@news.usenet.farm>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


In article <sBOiugbtclovhGuPYATJAnEihqCArILZ@news.usenet.farm>,
D. Ray  <d@ray> wrote:

>> 2) Within minutes, the Gaza Health Ministry accused the
>> IDF, and claimed that "over 500" were killed.

> From your own source: "International media initially reported that over 500
> Palestinians were killed according to the Gaza Health Ministry, but this
> was a mistranslation of a report that had mentioned over 500 total victims,
> including injured."

"The Gaza Health Ministry later reported a more precise figure of 471[sic]
killed and 342 wounded." 

This tells much about the "accuracy" of Gaza losses, as reported by
Hamas and other sources in Gaza. 

>> 3) It turned out that the hospital was hit by an Islamic
>> Jihad rocket.

> No, no. Turned out Jews claimed it was hit by “Islamic Jihad rocket.”

No, no, it was an Islamic Jihad rocket, which exploded in Gaza, as
have numerous other IJ and Hamas rockets.

"The Associated Press (AP) concluded on 20 October, from analyzing "more than a dozen videos from the 
moments before, during and after the hospital explosion, as well as satellite imagery and photos", that 
a rocket was "fired from within Palestinian territory"

"AP reported that its preliminary conclusion was supported by experts in open-source intelligence, 
geolocation, and rocketry, "who all agreed the most likely scenario was a rocket from within Gaza that 
veered off and came apart seconds before the explosion."

"Other factors cited by AP (sometimes attributed to identified experts) include the fact that Palestinian 
rockets would fail and fall inside Gaza in the past, the inconsistency of the damage and crater with 
Israeli air strikes (clarified further to be inconsistency with the use of "large bombs"), the 
inconsistency with other weapons such as artillery, mortars, car bombs or suicide vests, and the 
inability of Palestinians to produce evidence of Israeli munitions at Al-Ahli. AP quoted N.R. 
Jenzen-Jones as saying "the most likely explanation would be a failed militant rocket that was still 
full of highly flammable propellent"

etc. etc. etc.

Back to talk.politics.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

"40", or... 4? (Re: At Least 40 Killed NefeshBarYochai <void@invalid.noy> - 2024-11-16 05:48 +0000
  Re: "40", or... 4? (Re: At Least 40 Killed "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-11-18 08:51 -0600
    Re: "40", or... 4? (Re: At Least 40 Killed Michael Ejercito <MEjercit@HotMail.com> - 2024-11-22 08:07 -0800
  Re: "40", or... 4? (Re: At Least 40 Killed D. Ray <d@ray> - 2024-11-22 07:22 +0000
    Re: "40", or... 4? (Re: At Least 40 Killed hello there <no-spam-thank-you@not.home> - 2024-11-22 09:13 +0000
      Re: "40", or... 4? (Re: At Least 40 Killed "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-11-23 00:17 -0500

csiph-web