Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.mobile.android > #143610

Re: Paid apps

From Andrew <andrew@spam.net>
Newsgroups comp.mobile.android
Subject Re: Paid apps
Date 2024-10-02 19:27 +0000
Organization BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID <vdk6rn$19vb$2@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> (permalink)
References <lm01tcFes3sU1@mid.individual.net> <ftnvskx2ho.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <19zv2i8tu2v90.dlg@v.nguard.lh> <vdjpku.u0k.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw


Frank Slootweg wrote on 2 Oct 2024 13:43:28 GMT :

>   I mainly use OsmAnd+. For serious navigation, especially in remote
> areas (in our case rural/outback/remote Australia), there's really no
> feasible alternative.

For anywhere other than the USA, I'm sure what Frank says is correct, but
for the USA, you cannot get better offline maps for backcountry hiking than
the USGS geoPDFs, which plenty of map programs (e.g., Avenza, PaperMaps,
etc.) treat just like the OSM database is treated by OSMAnd(whatever).

Specifically the isocline lines in the offline OSM maps are atrociously
inaccurate, but if you're only following a trail, they'll work fine.

Conversely, the smaller creeks (the kind you can hop over) are MUCH BETTER
shown in the OSM database than in the USGS geoPDF 1:24000 quadrangles.

Hence, when I'm backcountry hiking, I have to use *both* to navigate.

Also the spoken navigation for walking in the OSMAnd~ program is excellent.

>   But for most people, in 'civilized' areas, Google Maps and HERE WeGo
> are perfectly fine as well. (I used Google Maps in urban areas of
> Australia, to find certain shops, Maccas :-), etc.).

I agree with Frank that in the civilized areas, Google Maps is as good as
it gets, although you have to be careful to create one-tap shortcuts to
turn off all the location tracking that Google Maps forces you to turn on
(which upload even when your wifi is turned off - which is sneaky of them).

In one case the offline OSMAnd~ program is BETTER than Google, and that is
when you're walking between buildings - such as apartment complexes or
shopping malls - where I find the offline OSMAnd~ does a much better job of
directing a pedestrian than does even the online Google Maps tools.

The main reason not to use Google Maps is that you have to turn on precise
location (even though it's not needed) and you often end up turning on
Wi-Fi Scanning for Google (which doesn't help you - it uploads to Google).

Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Paid apps Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-09-30 17:28 +0100
  Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-09-30 20:17 +0000
  Re: Paid apps VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2024-09-30 18:23 -0500
    Re: Paid apps Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-10-01 07:07 +0100
      Re: Paid apps VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2024-10-01 02:06 -0500
        Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-01 21:21 +0000
          Re: Paid apps "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-10-01 23:31 +0200
            Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 01:49 +0000
              Re: Paid apps "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-10-02 13:22 +0200
              Re: Paid apps micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2024-10-17 11:58 -0400
            Re: Paid apps Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-10-02 05:06 +0100
              Re: Paid apps "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-10-02 13:07 +0200
              Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 18:52 +0000
                Re: Paid apps Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-10-02 20:04 +0100
        Re: Paid apps Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-10-02 19:58 +0100
  Re: Paid apps "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-10-02 13:37 +0200
    Re: Paid apps Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-10-02 13:19 +0100
      Re: Paid apps "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-10-02 14:51 +0200
        Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 19:08 +0000
          Re: Paid apps Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-10-02 20:32 +0100
            Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 19:46 +0000
        Re: Paid apps micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2024-10-16 01:31 -0400
      Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 19:03 +0000
    Re: Paid apps VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2024-10-02 07:31 -0500
      Re: Paid apps "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-10-02 14:59 +0200
      Re: Paid apps Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-10-02 13:43 +0000
        Re: Paid apps "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-10-02 18:39 +0200
          Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 19:27 +0000
        Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 19:27 +0000
      Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 19:11 +0000
    Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 18:58 +0000
    Re: Paid apps sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2024-10-17 21:14 -0700
  Re: Paid apps Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> - 2024-10-02 14:09 +0100
    Re: Paid apps "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-10-02 18:44 +0200
      Re: Paid apps Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> - 2024-10-02 18:18 +0100
  Re: Paid apps Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2024-10-10 21:09 -0400

csiph-web