Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.mobile.android > #143602

Re: Paid apps

From Andrew <andrew@spam.net>
Newsgroups comp.mobile.android
Subject Re: Paid apps
Date 2024-10-02 18:58 +0000
Organization BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID <vdk556$bsp$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> (permalink)
References <lm01tcFes3sU1@mid.individual.net> <ftnvskx2ho.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>

Show all headers | View raw


Carlos E.R. wrote on Wed, 2 Oct 2024 13:37:51 +0200 :

> OsmAnd+ �X Maps & GPS Offline
> Simple Gallery Pro (Simple Mobile Tool)

I have both of these, but from F-Droid but bear in mind Simple Tools was
sold, so the apps on F-Droid may or may not be updated anymore.

 *OsmAnd+ Maps & GPS Offline by OsmAnd, FOSS
 <https://f-droid.org/repo/net.osmand.plus_431203.apk>
 <https://f-droid.org/en/packages/net.osmand.plus/>
 <https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd>
 <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.osmand.plus>
 <https://www.amazon.com/OsmAnd-Maps-Navigation/dp/B00D0SA8I8> 
 <https://i.postimg.cc/k440PXgJ/osmand01.jpg> OSMAnd+ manual map updates

 *Simple Gallery Pro* by Simple Mobile Tools 
 free, ad free, gsf free, 4.3 star 118K reviews 1M+ Downloads 
 <https://www.simplemobiletools.com/>
 <https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.simplemobiletools.gallery.pro/>
 <https://f-droid.org/repo/com.simplemobiletools.gallery.pro_385.apk>
 <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.simplemobiletools.gallery.pro> 

> Yes, some of these apps have a free version in the Play Store, and some 
> times another one in F-Droid; but they are not the exact same one. And 
> people like OsmAnd deserve the contribution.

Just for the record, Carlos and I have had this discussion before, and I
openly admit that Carlos is insistent that the OSMAnd+ on the Google Play
Store is materially different from the OSMAnd~ source on F-Droid.

I disagree.

So just for the record, I see what Carlos wrote above, and I understand
that Carlos feels the apps are materially different, but I do not.

As far as I'm aware, Carlos hasn't used the free version and I haven't used
the payware version - so we're both going only on what we find in print.

If someone *else* can prove either way, that would be a useful discussion,
but not Carlos, nor me, as we've more than once reached an impasse on it.

Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Paid apps Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-09-30 17:28 +0100
  Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-09-30 20:17 +0000
  Re: Paid apps VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2024-09-30 18:23 -0500
    Re: Paid apps Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-10-01 07:07 +0100
      Re: Paid apps VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2024-10-01 02:06 -0500
        Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-01 21:21 +0000
          Re: Paid apps "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-10-01 23:31 +0200
            Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 01:49 +0000
              Re: Paid apps "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-10-02 13:22 +0200
              Re: Paid apps micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2024-10-17 11:58 -0400
            Re: Paid apps Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-10-02 05:06 +0100
              Re: Paid apps "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-10-02 13:07 +0200
              Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 18:52 +0000
                Re: Paid apps Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-10-02 20:04 +0100
        Re: Paid apps Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-10-02 19:58 +0100
  Re: Paid apps "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-10-02 13:37 +0200
    Re: Paid apps Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-10-02 13:19 +0100
      Re: Paid apps "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-10-02 14:51 +0200
        Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 19:08 +0000
          Re: Paid apps Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-10-02 20:32 +0100
            Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 19:46 +0000
        Re: Paid apps micky <NONONOmisc07@fmguy.com> - 2024-10-16 01:31 -0400
      Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 19:03 +0000
    Re: Paid apps VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2024-10-02 07:31 -0500
      Re: Paid apps "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-10-02 14:59 +0200
      Re: Paid apps Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2024-10-02 13:43 +0000
        Re: Paid apps "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-10-02 18:39 +0200
          Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 19:27 +0000
        Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 19:27 +0000
      Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 19:11 +0000
    Re: Paid apps Andrew <andrew@spam.net> - 2024-10-02 18:58 +0000
    Re: Paid apps sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> - 2024-10-17 21:14 -0700
  Re: Paid apps Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> - 2024-10-02 14:09 +0100
    Re: Paid apps "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-10-02 18:44 +0200
      Re: Paid apps Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> - 2024-10-02 18:18 +0100
  Re: Paid apps Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2024-10-10 21:09 -0400

csiph-web