Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #10091
| From | Yao Wei <mwei@lxde.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Package name of src:fontmake |
| Date | 2018-01-27 15:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <vczl7-1Rf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi, We at Fonts Team are packaging utilities for building fonts from Glyphs.app and UFO format to OTF/TTF, and we are trying to align our package to Python Policy. The packaging effort is in Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fontmake We feel unsettled of the binary package naming. Should it be: * "fontmake" single package * "python3-fontmake" single package * "fontmake" package for /usr/bin and "python3-fontmake" package elsewhere? My personal intepretation is that since this package is not used as python library this should be "fontmake" single package, but we need someone from Python Teams to confirm that. Yao Wei
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Package name of src:fontmake Yao Wei <mwei@lxde.org> - 2018-01-27 15:10 +0100
Re: Package name of src:fontmake Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2018-01-27 15:30 +0100
Re: Package name of src:fontmake Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2018-01-27 19:40 +0100
Re: Package name of src:fontmake Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2018-01-28 05:00 +0100
Re: Package name of src:fontmake Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2018-01-29 11:10 +0100
csiph-web