Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #9901
| From | Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: Article 13 of the EU copyright review |
| Date | 2018-06-05 22:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <vXqUh-1Ha-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <vXoIO-rH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
* Chris Lamb: > Would there any strong objections to the Project aligning itself > against the new EU copyright review? For more background, here's a > recent Linux Journal article about this reform attempt: > > https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/how-eus-copyright-reform-threatens-open-source-and-how-fight-it Which part? I think the upload filters are fairly sensible, and Debian would implement them if required in practice. For us, infringing content is low-quality content, and we train our users to avoid uploading it. This is different for the likes of Youtube and Github. I find it also problematic to suggest that copyright infringement is somehow necessary for a thriving free software ecosystem. I find Title IV, Chapter 3 (“Fair remuneration in contracts of authors and performers”) far more problematic because as written, in seems to effectively ban irrevocable free software licenses: | Article 15 | Contract adjustment mechanism | | Member States shall ensure that authors and performers are entitled to | request additional, appropriate remuneration from the party with whom | they entered into a contract for the exploitation of the rights when | the remuneration originally agreed is disproportionately low compared | to the subsequent relevant revenues and benefits derived from the | exploitation of the works or performances. <https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2016/EN/1-2016-593-EN-F1-1.PDF> (Apologies if this is not the current version.) Germany already has similar provisions, but they exempt free culture/free software licensing: these provisions do not apply to works for which everyone has been granted basic exploitation rights. So yes, we should do something about Title IV, Chapter 3, but I expect that we'd be pretty much alone in that.
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Article 13 of the EU copyright review Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> - 2018-06-05 20:20 +0200
Re: Article 13 of the EU copyright review Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> - 2018-06-05 22:40 +0200
Re: Article 13 of the EU copyright review Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> - 2018-06-05 22:50 +0200
Re: Article 13 of the EU copyright review Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> - 2018-06-05 23:50 +0200
Re: Article 13 of the EU copyright review Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2018-06-05 23:40 +0200
Re: Article 13 of the EU copyright review Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> - 2018-06-07 11:30 +0200
Re: Article 13 of the EU copyright review Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> - 2018-06-14 22:40 +0200
Re: Article 13 of the EU copyright review Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> - 2018-06-10 23:40 +0200
csiph-web