Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #196170
| From | Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Usability BUG - Which package appropriate? |
| Date | 2018-05-28 21:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <vUw09-2PG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <vUvx8-2qS-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
Richard Owlett wrote: > In another thread I asked for text editor recommendations to address a > Later someone else suggested emacs. > My mental image of "emacs" was of something for a 'dumb terminal'. > I went to Synaptic searching for 'emacs'. > Got a hit for a metapaqckage - *NO* associated homepage. > Did a web search for 'emacs' which linked to > [https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/] which gave no relevant answers. The "documentation" link at the top didn't give you any clues? https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/documentation.html Or directly to the manual itself: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/index.html There is also a print manual (still undergoing volunteer proofreading, according to the "Purchase" link) -- you can get a free (as in beer) PDF version. It's 635 pages long. > *HOWEVER!!!!!* > The first line stated "Emacs 26.1 is out, download it here!" > Bu [https://packages.debian.org/stretch/emacs] refers to > "Package: emacs (46.1)". And goes onto say that it's a metapackage that depends on emacs24; so, in true Debian fashion, they're on what they consider to be "stable", even if it means it's a few versions behind. -- |_|O|_| Registered Linux user #585947 |_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert |O|O|O| PGP: 05CA 9A50 3F2E 1335 4DC5 4AEE 8E11 DDF3 1279 A281
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Usability BUG - Which package appropriate? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-05-28 21:00 +0200
Re: Usability BUG - Which package appropriate? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2018-05-28 21:30 +0200
Re: Usability BUG - Which package appropriate? Richard Owlett <rowlett@cloud85.net> - 2018-05-28 22:10 +0200
Re: Usability BUG - Which package appropriate? David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2018-05-28 23:30 +0200
Re: Usability BUG - Which package appropriate? likcoras <likcoras@riseup.net> - 2018-05-29 10:10 +0200
csiph-web