Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #195756
| From | conover@rahul.net (John Conover) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: AI spam filter |
| Date | 2018-05-15 05:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <vPylY-7CH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <vOX33-2c0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <vPuil-5fK-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
deloptes writes:
> Nicolas George wrote:
>
> I doubt there is something meaningful beyond bayesian spam filter. It is the
> most efficient way. Neural Network is a method, which would not apply very
> well to spam detection as it is more sophisticated and leads to unjustified
> overhead. This is my estimation only, but I spent few years studying some
> aspects of AI in the domain of text and speech processing and I think I
> would qualify for opinion.
> If I recall correctly bayesian method is based on providing probability by
> observing 1 item in context of 2 other items, which is scientifically
> proven to be most efficient. I recall there were statistics that you gain
> almost nothing if you add another 1 or 2 items to the context.
> At that time neural networks were introduced and we had few exercises, so I
> think I also know how basically NN works.
>
Its very old, (c. 1994, when "bugless" added scoring to recipes,) but
procmail(1) can be used for Bayesian UCE filtering, (or very close
approximation thereof.) See:
http://www.johncon.com/john/StochasticUCEDetection/
In addition, it can analyze message's metadata, (i.e., Received:
records, etc.,) and, importantly, handle whitelists, etc.
John
--
John Conover, conover@rahul.net, http://www.johncon.com/
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
AI spam filter Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2018-05-13 13:10 +0200
Re: AI spam filter Gregory Seidman <gsslist+debian@anthropohedron.net> - 2018-05-13 22:20 +0200
Re: AI spam filter Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> - 2018-05-13 22:30 +0200
Re: AI spam filter Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-05-14 11:50 +0200
Re: AI spam filter Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2018-05-14 12:30 +0200
Re: AI spam filter Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2018-05-14 14:10 +0200
Re: AI spam filter Darac Marjal <mailinglist@darac.org.uk> - 2018-05-14 14:20 +0200
Re: AI spam filter Abdullah Ramazanoğlu <ar018@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-15 00:10 +0200
Re: AI spam filter deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 00:20 +0200
Re: AI spam filter rhkramer@gmail.com - 2018-05-14 18:20 +0200
Re: AI spam filter deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 00:20 +0200
Re: AI spam filter deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 00:40 +0200
Re: AI spam filter conover@rahul.net (John Conover) - 2018-05-15 05:00 +0200
csiph-web