Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #195289

Re: Question about Running rsnapshot

From "Martin McCormick" <martin.m@suddenlink.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Question about Running rsnapshot
Date 2018-05-04 22:00 +0200
Message-ID <vLP21-3EF-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <vLN0e-2oR-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <vLNMC-2Va-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> writes:
> Hi,
> 
> Have you got your backup areas on different file systems?

I do.  The backup file system resides on a pair of 256 GB usb
drives which are ganged together in to 1 large drive using mmddfs
and then mounted on /var/cache/rsnapshot.  The very first backup
I took was the full backup and that particular file showed an
inode number of 16.  The remaining two backups are halfday.0 and
halfday.1.  Each of those files has a working version of that
same file and one has an inode number of 11 while the other has
an inode number of 6.  Each of these backups is a different tree
with the vast majority of files being hard links to the first
backup which copied the contents of the working drive to the
backup drive.

	As I write this, I am beginning to realize that maybe only
hard links in the same directory structure will reference the
same inode and that hard links spanning multiple directory trees
can be different but contain metadata that copy the map of the
original file which was the one that was on inode 16.

	If that is correct, then thank you for helping my slow
mind to think since I was confused and expected all the hard
links to have an inode of 16.

	The purpose behind this exercise is to make sure that the
backups I am creating are good as the first or full backup used
about 25% of the total space and the other two backups hardly
added any more space.  I was able to read the contents of the
file on each of the subsequent two backups so it definitely is
working.

Martin McCormick

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Question about Running rsnapshot "Martin McCormick" <martin.m@suddenlink.net> - 2018-05-04 19:50 +0200
  Re: Question about Running rsnapshot Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2018-05-04 20:40 +0200
    Re: Question about Running rsnapshot "Martin McCormick" <martin.m@suddenlink.net> - 2018-05-04 22:00 +0200
      Re: Question about Running rsnapshot Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> - 2018-05-04 22:10 +0200
      Re: Question about Running rsnapshot Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2018-05-04 22:10 +0200
        Re: Question about Running rsnapshot "Martin McCormick" <martin.m@suddenlink.net> - 2018-05-04 23:50 +0200
          Re: Question about Running rsnapshot Andrew McGlashan <andrew.mcglashan@affinityvision.com.au> - 2018-05-05 10:50 +0200
      Re: Question about Running rsnapshot Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <eduardo@kalinowski.com.br> - 2018-05-05 02:30 +0200

csiph-web