Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.theory > #137284

Re: Every rebuttal of anything that I have ever said on USENET has been entirely baseless

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/05/2025 05:38 PM, olcott wrote:
> Not one person can post a single date/time stamp
> or Google groups link to show otherwise.
>
> The strongest of these fake rebuttals was:
> "that is not how we memorized it".
>

"Overgeneralizations are generally un-sound."


Now, as somebody who's interested in contrary opinions,
yet not contrarians for contrarianisms sake,
and somebody who's demonstrated that various widely
held opinions in logical fields like logic are questionable,
and both fraglich and fragwurdig (dubitable and question-raising),
and indeed have some what may be "more true" implications,
after something like Goedelian incompleteness some
kind of super-Goedelian completeness,
as somebody interested in rational contrary opinions
for conscientious reasonings' sake, has that
usual notions of the constructible vis-a-vis universal
to be fair, are extra-ordinary.

Don't get me wrong, there's the great hypocrisy of
the ordinary Russell-ian retro-thesis that has readily
demonstrable that adherence to it is an "inductively sound"
yet "generally un-sound overgeneralization", so that
there's a taint of guilt on any soi-disant logician
who mistook "isolation and significance" for "completion
and relevance".


Or, as was written around here somewhere
"hone-ey swah key maal ee ponce", yet,
you know, "heal thyself".


If you really want extra-Goedelian completeness then
it demands a rather thorough account of theory and
"the generally sound universal overgeneralization".

Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Every rebuttal of anything that I have ever said on USENET has been entirely baseless olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-05 19:38 -0600
  Re: Every rebuttal of anything that I have ever said on USENET has been entirely baseless HAL 9000 <hal@discovery.nasa> - 2025-12-06 13:17 +0000
    Re: Every rebuttal of anything that I have ever said on USENET has been entirely baseless olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-06 07:49 -0600
      Re: Every rebuttal of anything that I have ever said on USENET has been entirely baseless HAL 9000 <hal@discovery.nasa> - 2025-12-07 18:07 +0000
        Re: Every rebuttal of anything that I have ever said on USENET has been entirely baseless olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-07 15:07 -0600
  Re: Every rebuttal of anything that I have ever said on USENET has been entirely baseless Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-06 08:28 -0800
    Re: Every rebuttal of anything that I have ever said on USENET has been entirely baseless olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-06 10:58 -0600
      Re: Every rebuttal of anything that I have ever said on USENET has been entirely baseless Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-12-06 23:16 -0800
        Re: Every rebuttal of anything that I have ever said on USENET has been entirely baseless olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2025-12-07 08:53 -0600

csiph-web